The phrase "at smaller landscape" is not correct in English.
It seems to be an incomplete or incorrect expression, possibly intended to refer to a "smaller landscape" or "in a smaller landscape."
Example: "The artist prefers to work at smaller landscapes, capturing the intricate details of nature."
Alternatives: "in a smaller setting" or "within a smaller area."
Because of the diversity of underlying biophysical and socioeconomic factors interacting across the terrestrial biosphere, anthropogenic processes and their effects on land cover likely exhibit substantial variability at the smaller landscape scale.
Efforts by Long and others (2010), while quite successful at clustering landscapes based on metric values, were of a much smaller landscape size (1 km in that study vs. 800 km here), covered a much smaller total area (5 million ha vs. 650 million ha here), and were based on a different satellite classification.
By 1819 he had already exhibited small landscape studies at the Royal Academy.
However, relatively coarse resolution (i.e., large pixel size) can obscure spatial variability in environmental conditions, including the occurrence of linear or small landscape elements at the local level.
In those years, he created 33 small landscape paintings.
Spatial scale affected the performance of the metrics, since woody plants, orthopterans and small terrestrial birds were usually better predicted at smaller extents of surrounding landscape, and reptiles frequently at larger ones.
However, the two Pipistrelle species responded differently to the surrounding landscape, P. pipistrellus being strongly influenced by the landscape at large scales (e.g. within 2 km of the monitoring site) and P. pygmaeus being most influenced by the landscape at smaller scales (within 500 m of the monitoring site).
We incorporate the third altitude dimension in landscape structure analysis, especially for detecting certain small-scale landscape structures such as groves, tree rows, and transitions at forest boundaries.
Specifically, compared to the healthy forests, those affected by disease exhibited higher landscape heterogeneity at smaller spatial scales (e.g., 25 and 50 m), which has been associated with decreased burn severity in the literature.
The knowledge base available to future management decisions also seems to lack information on connectivity in the landscape, habitat at smaller spatial scales and the effectiveness of reserved areas.
