at safeguards

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "at safeguards" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to measures or protocols in place to protect something, but the phrase lacks clarity and context. Example: "The company has implemented several measures at safeguards to ensure data security."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

On matters ranging from snowmobiles in Yellowstone to roadless areas in the national forests, his administration has tried steadily to chip away at safeguards put in place by the Clinton administration -- largely in an effort to help the oil, gas, timber and mining industries, and often in cavalier disregard for environmental reviews mandated by law.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

And proclaimed the era of Outright Monetary Transactions in sovereign bond markets aimed "at safeguarding an appropriate monetary policy transmission and the singleness of the monetary policy" is about to begin.

Huffington Post

The second is international, through a more cooperative approach to multilateral attempts at safeguarding the environment.

The New York Times

It is aimed at safeguarding Americans' rights to free expression, enshrined in our constitution.

The Guardian - Opinion

"These officers did a masterful job at not only capturing the armed robbers but at safeguarding the customers," said Paul J. Browne, the Police Department's chief spokesman.

The New York Times

The computer held the personal details of 382,000 former and present employees.American firms and institutions seem particularly lax at safeguarding private information.

The Economist

But the law required couples to legally separate first — a period of reflection aimed at safeguarding the family in a socially conservative Catholic country.

The New York Times

Prior to his business success at Rapidforms, Howard held executive positions at Safeguard Industries, Raytheon, and Royal McBee, beginning his career as Gillette Company's first management trainee.

The New York Times

(As it happens, the Bush Administration's 2002 budget proposal called for dramatically reducing the outgoing Clinton Administration's allocation for programs aimed at safeguarding the Russian nuclear stockpile).

The New Yorker

A12 Genetic Privacy Bill Passes The Senate voted unanimously to pass the first federal bill aimed exclusively at safeguarding genetic privacy.

The New York Times

Mr. Schmitz is a senior associate for acquisitions at Safeguard Scientifics, a holding company for Internet and communications concerns, in Wayne, Pa.

The New York Times - Style

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "at safeguards" in formal writing. Opt for more grammatically sound alternatives like "for safeguards" or "regarding safeguards" to ensure clarity and correctness.

Common error

A common mistake is using the preposition "at" when "for" or "regarding" is more appropriate. Using "at" implies a location or direction, which doesn't logically connect with the concept of safeguards. Instead, use prepositions that indicate purpose or subject matter.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "at safeguards" functions as a prepositional phrase, though its use is questionable. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's not grammatically correct, and its meaning isn't always clear. The single example found in Ludwig suggests a context related to measures or protocols.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "at safeguards" is grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity. Ludwig AI highlights that it doesn't convey a clear meaning in written English. While it appears in some sources, like news and scientific articles, its use is infrequent and not recommended for formal writing. Instead, it's best to use alternatives like "for safeguards" or "regarding safeguards" to accurately and clearly communicate the intended meaning of protective measures or security protocols. Opting for these alternatives ensures grammatical correctness and enhances the overall clarity of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for safeguards

Replaces 'at' with 'for' to indicate the purpose of the safeguards.

regarding safeguards

Uses 'regarding' to specify the topic being discussed involves safeguards.

concerning safeguards

Employs 'concerning' to refer to matters related to safeguards.

pertaining to safeguards

Utilizes 'pertaining to' to indicate a direct relevance to safeguards.

about safeguards

Uses 'about' to broadly indicate the subject matter is safeguards.

in relation to safeguards

Indicates the connection or relationship to the safeguards being discussed.

with respect to safeguards

Formally addresses the specific aspect of safeguards.

designed for safeguards

Highlights the intended purpose or design related to safeguards.

intended for safeguards

Focuses on the intention or planning behind the safeguards.

conducive to safeguards

Indicates that something contributes to or supports the existence of safeguards.

FAQs

How can I use the term "safeguards" correctly in a sentence?

Use "safeguards" with prepositions like "for", "regarding", or "concerning" to indicate purpose or topic. For example, instead of "at safeguards", try "measures "for safeguards"".

What is a more grammatically correct alternative to "at safeguards"?

Alternatives include ""for safeguards"", "regarding safeguards", or "concerning safeguards". These options provide clarity and grammatical accuracy.

Is "at safeguards" considered formal or informal language?

Because it's grammatically questionable, "at safeguards" is generally unsuitable for formal writing. Opt concerning safeguards for more formal alternatives to maintain professionalism and precision.

Why is "at safeguards" considered grammatically incorrect?

The preposition "at" usually denotes a location or time, which doesn't logically fit with the concept of safeguards. Safeguards aren't typically a place, so prepositions indicating purpose or relation (like "for" or "regarding") are more accurate.