The phrase "at risk for contamination" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that something is vulnerable or susceptible to being contaminated.
Example: "The food products stored in the open air are at risk for contamination due to exposure to pollutants."
Alternatives: "vulnerable to contamination" or "susceptible to contamination".
Some topics here are certainly food for thought; 48 % directs potentially contaminated patients into the waiting room with all other patients at risk for contamination.
Chicken with arsenic is most certainly not O.K. Most chickens raised for meat in the United States continue to be fed this poison, making most chicken meat at risk for contamination.
Unincorporated places are particularly at risk for contamination, since their wells tend to be shallower.
For the farmers on Kauai that practice organic and sustainable agricultural practices, their crops are at risk for contamination.
They said it could put California's groundwater at risk for contamination.
If you eat beef, or take milk and sugar in your coffee (and even if you don't), here is why you should care: The move could put organic foods at risk for contamination and make it more expensive.
A study by the University of California, Davis, this year estimated that 254,000 people in the Tulare Basin and Salinas Valley, prime agricultural regions with about 2.6 million residents, were at risk for nitrate contamination of their drinking water.
Now with revelations that the city's 30,000 plus homes are in fact at risk for lead contamination, residents like Lee, who have suffered as tens of thousands of autoworkers lost their jobs in recent decades, have finally been pushed to the edge with a sense of abandonment by city and state officials.
Streams with urban influence throughout the country in areas where road salt is applied are at risk for substantial contamination and detrimental effect on aquatic life.
An As testing campaign relying on field kits and targeting 5 million wells in regions identified to be at risk for As contamination was initiated in 2001 and completed in 2004.
Instead, the city's water department tested large numbers of homes at lower risk for contamination, which in regulators' words may have "diluted" test results.
