The phrase "at lower clock" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to refer to a lower clock speed or frequency in a technical context, such as computing or electronics.
Example: "The processor operates efficiently at lower clock speeds to conserve energy."
Alternatives: "at reduced clock speed" or "at a lower frequency."
Alternatively, the resulting parallel streams can be combined at the output resulting in a system whose majority of logic runs at lower clock frequencies, while achieving high throughput.
Completing a given task in shorter time or at lower clock frequency can reduce dynamic power consumption; however, the power consumption comparison is not made in this article.
Firstly, the resulting parallel streams (modulated) can be combined at the output, resulting in a system whose majority of logic runs at lower clock frequencies, while allowing for high throughput even at low modulation levels.
The need for fewer execution cycles means that system can either run for shorter time at the same clock frequency or run for longer time at lower clock frequency (while still ensuring the task completion on time).
The Atom chips run at lower clock speeds, topping out at 1.8 gigahertz, compared with more than three GHz for Intel's desktop processors, but they will use much less power.
An evaluation board which operates at a lower clock rate is used (along with an emulator) to obtain the decoder performance measurements discussed in subsequent sections, but the results are given for the clock rate of the production device.
It turns out that especially for the 1-μm-sized system, physical limits on the achievable removal of heat drive the need to operate at a lower clock speed.
More cores mean that each core individually can run at a lower clock speed, but to get more performance you either need software that can harness the collective power of cores or a different approach to using those cores.
The new instructions work directly with 24-bit audio data types and allow the processor to more efficiently process audio data streams, which in turn allows the Diamond 330HiFi DSP to perform the same work at a lower clock rate and to therefore dissipate less power while executing the audio codecs.
The key differences between the implementations at chip level are the low leakage silicon technology and lower clock frequency used in mobile devices.
Thus, a clock can tick by its own, if it is enabled, but no lower clock is.
