The phrase "at least conceptually" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing ideas or theories that may not be fully realized in practice but are understood in theory.
Example: "The theory is sound, at least conceptually, but we need to test it in real-world scenarios."
Alternatives: "at least in theory" or "at a conceptual level".
But, she added, with the development of a family of test dummies, "at least conceptually, we have made a big step forward".
Watch out for some nasty family rows.Parts of the EU are now mature enough to understand, at least conceptually, that there is not much money around.
It is an angle that at least conceptually casts the premise of Lucia's trysts with her brother's sworn enemy in a new light, and James Robinson, the director, has revealed plans to put it to dramatic use.
The Serbian writer Milorad Pavic may win the prize: he has attempted novels disguised as a crossword puzzle, a tarot book and even a clepsydra, an ancient water clock (at least conceptually; the pages are dry).
Not long after the session began, Ray threw a pitch that Baxter smacked, sending the ball toward right-center field and watching it carry over the fence for what was, at least conceptually, the first home run of his life.
The best of that bunch, at least conceptually, was @modularconx's Centum-Quadragintitus, which was burdened with an awful name but identified a specific, poignant emotion associated with new technology: "The anxiety felt by a perfect Tweet, only to see -1 displayed".
On this interpretation, the main premise of the argument is not that the relevant questions are conceptually open, but the much more modest premise that they at least seem conceptually open to competent users of moral terms.
Yet it could be argued that Goldsworthy's work is at least as conceptually rich as Smithson's; his compressions of space and water as metaphysically suggestive as the sculpture of Anish Kapoor; his use of found materials as inflected with past use and future alteration as the wood pieces of his friend David Nash; and his meditations on decay, mortality, and generation as smart as Damien Hirst's.
Implementation of such structural reforms is difficult, however, for at least two conceptually different reasons.
Hence, they could at least be conceptually recognized – despite being structurally unrelated – as innate counterparts to Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules – equally recognizing antigenic ligands (albeit structurally more homogeneous i.e., peptides), again derived from self and/or non-self sources – preeminent this time in adaptive immunity.
Many of the available HIF models aim to theoretically explain this hypothetical switching mechanism, and at least three conceptually different explanations have been provided.
