The phrase "at doctor level" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing qualifications or expertise related to medical professionals, but it is better to clarify the intended meaning.
Example: "The research was conducted at doctor level, ensuring high standards of medical accuracy."
Alternatives: "at a professional level" or "at a medical level".
As indicated in the results, the level of training in family medicine correlated positively and significantly with mean CARE Measure scores at doctor level.
This makes the Chinese-CARE Measure highly feasible as a tool to measure performance at doctor level, given that the collection of data from 30 patients is not an onerous task.
In the following quote, Manufacturer #4 is asked who would be consulted in identifying design requirements for the development of the given medical device: #4: P 1 : "...it's through the doctors to, its [name]'s contact with the hospitals out there, now then I doubt it would be at doctor level, it would be more the managerial level of the hospital... .......
With regard to our second hypothesis (that more variation in outcomes intended to measure the performance of individual doctors would occur at doctor level than at practice level), we found evidence that more of the variation in results on the communication scale, which was intended to assess individual doctors, occurred at the level of the doctor rather than the practice.
*Lower confidence limit restricted to 0. With regard to our first hypothesis (that more variation in practice outcomes would occur at practice level than at doctor level), table 3 shows that for overall satisfaction and communication a very small proportion of the variation occurs at practice level, but for access and wait for appointment a larger proportion is attributable to practices.
Nevertheless, when they go back to full time work there should be no pay disparity at junior doctor level.
The supporting evidence for revalidation includes a requirement for patient experience to be assessed periodically at individual doctor level.
Model estimates were then used to derive a simple predictive algorithm, designed for application at the doctor level.
CIs on all estimates were calculated using bias corrected bootstrapping with 1000 repetitions and resampling at the doctor level.
The conventional wisdom is that future medico-legal events cannot be predicted at the doctor level with acceptable levels of accuracy.
The approach used by Rolph 11 14 21 and others who have emulated his method, 15 17 24 'fixes' the effect of prior events in a single variable at the doctor level.
