at distances of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "at distances of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to measurements or intervals of time or distance. For example, "The planets rotate around the sun at distances of millions of miles."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Most gamma ray bursts occur at distances of 8 billion to 10 billion light-years.

The New York Times

Gyration (www.gyration.com) says the unit operates at distances of up to 100 feet.

The New York Times - Tech

All these objects seemed to thin out at distances of several thousand light-years.

Britannica

The star's three innermost planets all circle more tightly than Mercury at distances of 22 million to 3.5 million miles.

The New York Times

Provisional plans have New Horizons passing between Pluto and Charon at distances of 10,000km and 27,000km respectively.

The Guardian

workers were found foraging at distances of up to 2.2 km from their nests.

Biological Conservation

Northrop made 13 of 18 attempts this season and was 10 of 11 at distances of 40 yards or less.

The New York Times - Sports

Jeter went through another full workout today, throwing extensively and at distances of up to about 80 yards.

The New York Times - Sports

We deployed 24 camera-trap stations at distances of ∼2 km from each other.

Mammalian Biology - Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde

On a moonless night, scorpions can be seen at distances of 10 metres (33 feet).

Encyclopedia Britannica

We have considered several initial starting positions for the planet at distances of 1.140, 1.165, 1.195 and 1.225 a.u.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing measurements, always include units to ensure clarity and avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of "objects were placed "at distances of" 10", specify "objects were placed "at distances of" 10 meters".

Common error

Ensure that you use the same unit of measurement throughout your writing when describing "at distances of". Mixing metric and imperial units can confuse the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "at distances of" functions as a prepositional phrase. It modifies a verb or noun by specifying the extent of spatial separation or range between objects or locations. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable form in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

30%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "at distances of" is a grammatically correct and versatile prepositional phrase used to specify spatial separation. According to Ludwig, it is suitable for diverse contexts, including scientific, news-related, and encyclopedic content. The phrase is more formal and precise than alternatives like "nearby" or "separated by", making it ideal for technical and objective writing. To ensure clarity, always provide units of measurement and maintain consistency throughout your writing. Keep in mind the importance of context. In conclusion, "at distances of" is a reliable phrase for accurately conveying spatial information in various forms of communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

separated by

Focuses on the act of separation rather than the measurement.

with a range of

Emphasizes the span or extent of distance.

within a radius of

Specifies a circular area of separation.

spaced apart by

Highlights the action of spacing items at intervals.

from a vantage point of

Focuses on the observational distance.

lying a certain distance from

Indicates the position of something in relation to something else.

situated a specified distance away

Highlights the situation or placement based on separation.

positioned with an offset of

Implies a deliberate arrangement with measurable separation.

scattered across

Highlights the distribution, emphasizing that the objects are not close to each other.

extending outward to

Focuses on outward directional measurement.

FAQs

How can I use "at distances of" in a sentence?

Use "at distances of" to describe the separation between objects or locations. For instance, "The planets orbit the sun "at distances of" millions of miles".

What are some alternatives to "at distances of"?

You can use alternatives like "separated by", "with a range of", or "within a radius of" depending on the context.

Is it more formal to say "at distances of" or "nearby"?

"At distances of" is generally more formal and precise, suitable for scientific or technical writing, while "nearby" is less formal and appropriate for general conversation.

How does the meaning change if I use "from a distance of" instead of "at distances of"?

"From a distance of" emphasizes the perspective or observation point, whereas "at distances of" focuses on the measurement or separation itself. You can say "We observed the phenomenon from a distance of 10 meters", while you can say "The sensors were positioned "at distances of" 5, 10, and 15 meters apart".