Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The sample size required depends on a significance level set at conventional level of 5% and power set at conventional level of 90%.
Similar(58)
The uptick in the Labor TPP estimate – from 49%to50%0% – is far from being statistically significant at conventional levels.
The impact, although positive, is not significant at conventional levels.
Still, the estimated effects are not statistically significant at conventional levels.
The results were similar, but less precisely estimated at conventional levels of significance.
In the case of Urine Tests, the estimate is insignificant at conventional levels (Table 9).
The coefficient on the interaction term is positive but imprecisely estimated at conventional levels.
Again, all of the estimated effects are statistically significant at conventional levels.
In neither case is this relationship statistically significant at conventional levels.
The effect is still sizable for men (5.1 percentage points), but is no longer significant at conventional levels.
A similar effect among males was not statistically significant at conventional levels, plausibly due to the smaller sample size.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com