The phrase "at conflicts with" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "conflicts with"? You can use "conflicts with" when discussing situations where two or more things are in opposition or disagreement.
Example: "The new policy conflicts with our existing regulations, creating confusion among employees."
Alternatives: "is at odds with" or "contradicts".
In a bizarre situation, two judicial bodies are at conflict with each other.
Coming at the end of a week in which the G8 summit in France approved funding for countries embracing democracy in the wake of the Arab spring, it has led to accusations that the government's foreign policy is at conflict with itself.
Mr. Pollack's movies often emphasized the loner at conflict with society, whether a fur trapper in the wilderness in "Jeremiah Johnson" (1972) or a cowboy who tries to recover his soul after selling out in "The Electric Horseman" (1979) with Robert Redford and Jane Fonda.
Unfortunately, biological evolution is often perceived to be at conflict with a variety of variables including the worldviews associated with some religions (Heddy & Nadelson, 2012; Rosengren et al. 2012).
That growth, Lemons says, has developed into a community at conflict with itself.
It is hard to imagine true centralized fiscal control when national interests are at conflict with the perceived European objectives dictated by a powerful minority, perhaps a minority of one.
However, their suggestion that the majority of education programs are designed for younger/more recently diagnosed patients and that minimal attention has been paid to the development of successful interventions for older adults with diabetes is at conflict with much recent (2), and less recent (3), literature.
Finally, we note that some of the estimates of mutation rates reported in the original publications were at conflict with what could be estimated using the number of novel bands, the mean number of bands scored and the number of individuals, and also in these cases have we used our own estimate rather than what was reported in the paper.
Similar patterns concerning the population-specific correlations have also been described for other taxa (Scales et al. 2011; Bengston et al. 2014; Martins and Bhat 2014), but evidence at conflict with the between-population divergence of behavioral syndromes has also been reported (Brydges et al. 2008; Herczeg et al. 2009; Pruitt et al. 2010).
This wish to detect small changes in exposure, which would call for optimized data analysis procedures, is at conflict with the wish to keep the EVA lay-out constant across and within subjects so that inter- and intra-subject comparisons are possible.
