The phrase "at a site level" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that pertains specifically to a particular location or site, often in contexts like project management, research, or organizational operations.
Example: "The data collected will be analyzed at a site level to ensure accuracy and relevance to each specific location."
Alternatives: "on a site basis" or "at the location level".
Reports are also generated at a site level for the other healthcare providers to access.
All serious adverse events were classified by an independent Endpoint Committee (Appendix 1), such that no pre-selection exclusion of potential clinical events was undertaken by the investigators at a site level.
While conservation objectives and the approach to management were decided at a site level, there was interaction between the sites, recognizing the ecological processes (particularly dynamic coastal processes) that link them.
Continuous analysis of the data was carried out on a site level at the different research centres as well as centrally across all sites.
Whilst there are many advantages of the framework, the major points are that the reporting statements of the framework, when presented together, can better enable the public to understand water interactions at a site-level and allows for valid comparisons between sites, regardless of locale and commodity.
PAR pain: Pressure Area Related pain which is defined as pain, soreness or discomfort on any "at risk" skin site, reported at a skin site level (i.e. attributable).
Campaigns planned at a total site level can overstate reach, understate frequency and may not deliver the desired demographic.
PU pain: Pressure Ulcer pain which is defined as pain, soreness or discomfort on any PU skin site, reported at a skin site level (i.e. attributable).
I evaluated the presence of contaminants such as mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in order to characterize the properties of sediment dwelling insect communities along with relative impacts from land used for agriculture, forested tracts, and urbanized land, at an individual site level.
We compared site-average concentrations from 2003 through 2005 with chronic health benchmarks at an individual site level and tabulated the results.
A sample size calculation indicated that a total sample of 64 participants would have provided 80%% power to detect an effect size of 0.4 given eight site-level clusters, a mean of eight participants per cluster, a two-tailed alpha of 0.05, one baseline assessment, eight follow-up assessments, a correlation between follow-up assessments within participants of 0.5 and an ICC at site level of 0.01.
