The phrase "at a recipient" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to something directed towards a recipient, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear.
Example: "The message was sent at a recipient's address, but it never arrived."
Alternatives: "to a recipient" or "for a recipient".
Putative LGT events are drawn as arrows originating from a donor (indicated by a circle) and terminating at a recipient.
3. The prognostic covariate under consideration is associated with the treatment outcome at a recipient level (uterus sub-model, β ep2 = 0 and β up = 0.1, 0.2,…,1).
Due to the high security offered, Registered Mail typically takes 10 to 14 days to arrive at a recipient's address.
The K. pneumoniae M-9 Rif strain was used as a recipient at intraspecies conjugation, and the E. coli HB101 Rif was used as a recipient at interspecies conjugation.
By not looking at the homeless man as a recipient of charity rather as an owner of a business, the recurring pattern was broken!
Scaling down also concerns researchers at Motorola, a recipient of a spintronics grant from the defense research agency.
BTM is the Director of the Environmental Pathology Training Program at UVM, a recipient of the Wagner Award presented by the International Mesothelioma Interest Group for scientific contributions to research on MM, and an awardee of the Career Achievement Recognition Award for Scientific Accomplishments from the American Thoracic Society.
Her son Daniel is a theoretical physicist at Rutgers University and a recipient of a MacArthur Foundation "genius" grant; Jonathan is an engineer in Philadelphia; Emily is a pediatrician in Buffalo.
But image alone does not make you a writer of bestselling science books, a working peer, a professor of pharmacology at Oxford and a recipient of the Légion d'Honneur.
KENNETH COLE The stock market correction in May and April let Kenneth Cole, another designer with a big ownership interest (like Millard S. Drexler at J. Crew, a recipient of an F two years ago) take his company private.
At that rate, a recipient would have to work every day for 116 years to earn what Mr González will make this year.Does Mr González deserve his generous haul?
