The phrase "asynchronous test" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to programming, software development, or educational assessments where tasks or processes do not occur simultaneously.
Example: "The developers implemented an asynchronous test to evaluate the performance of the application under varying loads."
Alternatives: "non-simultaneous test" or "delayed test".
First, we used a synchronously presented, high-contrast pedestal prior to presenting the test gratings, which was very effective at masking the apparent motion cue between the asynchronous test gratings.
Importantly, possible side effects of confusion, response bias, or other unknown strategic effects will affect both the asynchronous test condition and the synchronous baseline condition equally, and when the size of the temporal ventriloquist effect relative to the synchronous baseline is calculated, these possible unwanted side effects will be subtracted.
In this context, asynchronous tests can be more appropriate, reflecting the underlying test architecture which includes queues.
We present a Globally Asynchronous Locally Synchronous test chip fabricated on a 130nm silicon process.
Likewise, Andreasen et al. [27], Bruun et al. [44] compared different approaches to remote asynchronous usability testing.
Several usability testing methods have been developed where interaction data is complemented with users' design feedback, such as cooperative evaluation, cooperative usability testing, and asynchronous remote usability testing.
When users' design feedback is gathered as a budget approach to classical usability testing, as in asynchronous remote usability testing (e.g. [44]), or a way to identify problems in the users' everyday context, as in inquiry methods as part of field tests (e.g. [45]), it is critical that the evaluation output holds adequate validity and thoroughness.
Command and Control (C2) systems are complex and require large capital investments, asynchronous design and test periods for different elements, and long deployment lifecycles of substituent elements.
Two days after launch in both M-2 and M-3 missions a delayed asynchronous ground control test was initiated.
For this experiment, each participant was presented with four conditions: synchronous and asynchronous stroking while testing for disownership, and synchronous and asynchronous stroking while testing for ownership.
Further in depth analysis of the reference group found that there was not a significant difference in performance on pre-test questions covering asynchronous content and pre-test questions covering didactic content with mean scores of 60.72% ± 19.84 and 53.13% ± 12.94 respectively with a mean difference of 7.60% [−5.07 to 20.25]; p = 0.20.
