The phrase "assumption we compared the" is not correct and appears to be incomplete in written English.
It may be used in contexts discussing a comparison based on certain assumptions, but it requires additional context to be fully understandable.
Example: "Based on the assumption we compared the data sets, we found significant differences in the results."
Alternatives: "the assumption we evaluated" or "the assumption we analyzed".
To test the profitability implications of this assumption, we compared the matched sample of 8330 customers with and without social media interactions from Study 2 with respect to the revenues and costs for the focal company.
In order to check this assumption we compared the self-perceived BMI, obtained through the manipulation of the silhouette representing individuals whose preferences are examined, to the actual BMI, reported by individuals.
To quantitatively test this assumption we compared the Gaussian profile to an alternative model that could be addressed analytically.
To further validate this assumption, we compared the growth rates between MC+ and MC− cells from several of our top hits.
Following this assumption, we compared the average length of state transitions in each phase in the models, referring to the relative duration of each phase in nature.
To test this assumption, we compared the K10 and K6 sum scores with 12-month DSM-IV classifications present in the year preceding the interview.
To verify this assumption, we compare the actual crowd density at a specific location to the App user density at the same location.
Under these assumptions, we compared the statistical properties of the t-test comparing K ¯ i C and K ¯ i T with the t-test comparing MR ¯ gluc max,C and MR ¯ gluc max,T.
To check whether the accuracy of volatility forecasting among the different models varied with distribution assumptions, we compared the log-likelihood, Schwarz Bayesian information criterion (SBC), and Akaike information criterion (AIC) for all of the models, estimating for whole-sample observations under normal and Student's t-error distribution.
To assess the first of these assumptions, we compared the level of expression for in D. yakuba for 21 genes where all 14 probesets in D. yakuba were also PM in D. melanogaster.
To further support this assumption, we compared UV vis absorption of the supernatant solution with the control experiments.
