The phrase "assumption statements" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing statements that are based on assumptions or presuppositions in various fields such as logic, philosophy, or research.
Example: "In our analysis, we need to clarify the assumption statements that underpin our hypothesis to ensure a solid foundation for our conclusions."
Alternatives: "presumption statements" or "hypothetical statements".
I'd never worked on a HIA before in that context… One of the things that can be a bit daunting too, and I'm going to make a sort of assumption statement now, one of the things that can be quite daunting is someone from the [university] comes in and says, 'you beaut, great, fantastic tool to use'.
Shift the assumption statement away from you.
The assumption statement – this manipulative tactic seeks to turn your behavior into what the beholder perceives it as, whether or not their interpretation is accurate.
The problem with the assumption statement is that there is no question; a manipulator doesn't like asking questions because it causes them to feel a loss of control.
In this way, Tsiatis and Davidian provided a nice overview of joint models [ 12], describing further details on underlying assumptions statements and on the likelihood of model parameters in such models.
Some assumption or statements which appear above are not very pleasant for me to read. 1.
One core assumption in statements of this calibration puzzle is that small-stakes risk aversion is observed over all levels of wealth, or over a "sufficiently large" range of wealth.
Even without directly harmful acts, subtle and often unintentional assumptions and statements (often referred to as "microaggressions") can erode a person's sense of belonging and respect.
(8) We see that, for each (w^{0}in X), all assumptions (A) and (B) of Theorem 10.1 in ((X,mathcal{M}_{{1};{1}},ast)) hold and, for (k=2), the assumptions in statements (C - D) of Theorem 10.1 hold.
It remains to connect the above global oscillation theorem with the traditional statement saying that the j-th eigenfunction has exactly j generalized zeros in the interval (0, N + 1]. We will see that under some additional assumption the statement of this result remains exactly the same when we replace the eigenfunctions of (E0) by its finite eigenfunctions.
