That assumption sounds fair.
Perhaps our assumption of fair sampling was wrong, or perhaps some strange, unknown mechanism really did exploit the freedom-of-choice loophole, in effect alerting one receiving station of what was about to occur at the other.
This assumption seems fair in an Internet-like setting where the server can observe the connections with the users, so he knows who is currently online or not.
We are still engaging under the assumption of fair play.
This assumption seems fair in light of the estimated average 84% accuracy (2008 2013: SD=2.0%) of IMS Health data in representing the Indian pharmaceutical market.
To make the models fit the facts, you have to tweak their assumptions a fair bit, which is what Dr Shindell and some of the scientists who are trying to explain the pause have done.
Is that a fair assumption to make?
A fair assumption, you might think.
It's a fair assumption that Other Lives admire Radiohead.
DP I think it's a fair assumption.
