Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
assuming without proof
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "assuming without proof" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that a statement or conclusion is being accepted as true without providing evidence or justification. Example: "In this discussion, we will be assuming without proof that all participants have a basic understanding of the topic."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Wiki
Alternative expressions(19)
leaping to conclusions
jumping to conclusions
rushing to conclusions
leap to conclusions
jump to conclusions
rushing to judge
rushing to catch
drawing assumptions
calling assumptions
design assumptions
design specifications
making baseless assumptions
assuming a lot
assumptions
operating under the assumption
asking a lot
premature conclusions
unfounded assumptions
baseless deductions
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
But unless and until it can be proven that an unborn child is not a living human being, can we justify assuming without proof that it isn't?
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
This reasoning is also petitio principii (a proposition which requires proof is assumed without proof).
News & Media
Or perhaps they assume without proof that most of the latter have been co-opted into organismal roles: in any case they do not even implicitly engage with MLS theory.
Science
He thought that the persons requesting photocopies constituted plaintiff's market and that each photocopy user is a potential subscriber "or at least a potential source of royalty income for licensed copying". Studies rejecting as "fair use" the kind of photocopying involved here have also assumed, without real proof, that the journal publishers have been and will be injured.
Academia
Then there is an operator R ∈ R and there is a vector x 1 ∈ E such that R K x 1 = x 1. Proof We may assume, without loss of generality, that ∥ K ∥ = 1.
We may assume without loss of generality that and (the proof for is similar).
In the proof of this theorem, we may assume without loss of generality that (4.8).
Of course we can assume without lose of generality that (x_{0}neq f(x_{0})), since otherwise the proof is finished.
Proof Since α n → 0 as n → ∞, we may assume, without loss of generality, α n < 1 for all n.
Proof Since lim n → ∞ α n = 0, we may assume, without loss of generality, that α n ≤ ( 1 − β n ) ∥ A ∥ − 1.
Hence, we may assume, without loss of generality, that β n > κ for all n ≥ 1. Next, we divide the proof of the sufficiency into several steps.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "assuming without proof", ensure you acknowledge the lack of evidence to maintain transparency and avoid misleading your audience. This acknowledges that the statement is a starting point, not a conclusion.
Common error
Avoid presenting information "assuming without proof" as definitive truths. Always qualify such statements with caveats like 'it is assumed' or 'for the sake of argument'.
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "assuming without proof" functions as an adverbial phrase modifying a verb. It indicates the manner in which something is being assumed, emphasizing the absence of supporting evidence or justification. As Ludwig AI points out, it is grammatically correct.
Frequent in
Science
30%
News & Media
30%
Academia
20%
Less common in
Wiki
10%
Encyclopedias
5%
Formal & Business
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "assuming without proof" is a grammatically sound and usable expression indicating that a statement is being accepted as true despite lacking evidence. According to Ludwig AI, its correctness is confirmed. While not exceedingly common, it finds use across diverse fields, including science, news, academia, and even general knowledge contexts like wikis. When deploying this phrase, consider more precise alternatives like presuming without evidence or taking for granted without verification for enhanced formality or clarity. Always qualify assumptions to maintain transparency and avoid inadvertently presenting them as verified facts.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
presuming without evidence
Replaces "proof" with "evidence" to emphasize the lack of supporting data.
taking for granted without verification
Highlights the acceptance of something as true without checking its validity.
accepting on faith
Implies reliance on belief rather than factual support.
positing without substantiation
Suggests a statement is made without providing any supporting details or validation.
asserting without foundation
Emphasizes the absence of a solid base or reason for the claim.
speculating without confirmation
Indicates conjecture that hasn't been validated.
hypothesizing without validation
Focuses on formulating a hypothesis without undergoing testing or validation.
theorizing without empirical support
Highlights the lack of real-world data to back up a theory.
claiming without validation
Suggests an unverified assertion is presented as fact.
postulating without demonstration
Emphasizes stating something exists or is true without showing it.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "assuming without proof" in academic writing?
In academic writing, you can use phrases like "hypothesizing without validation", "theorizing without empirical support", or "positing without substantiation" to maintain a formal tone while acknowledging the lack of evidence.
Is it acceptable to use "assuming without proof" in formal contexts?
While grammatically correct, "assuming without proof" might sound informal for certain formal contexts. Consider using more precise terms like "presuming without evidence" or "taking for granted without verification" for added clarity and professionalism.
What is the difference between "assuming without proof" and "assuming"?
"Assuming" implies a general acceptance of something, while "assuming without proof" specifically highlights that the assumption lacks supporting evidence. The latter is a more explicit acknowledgement of the uncertainty involved.
When should I avoid using "assuming without proof"?
Avoid using "assuming without proof" in situations where evidence is readily available or where the lack of proof could significantly undermine your argument. In such cases, seek evidence or qualify your statement more cautiously.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested