assuming liability for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "assuming liability for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or contractual contexts to indicate that one party is taking responsibility for certain obligations or potential damages. Example: "By signing this agreement, the contractor is assuming liability for any damages that may occur during the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

But he also said that the federal government was not assuming liability for all checked luggage.

The New York Times - Travel

But now the city is demanding that Lincoln Center join the others in assuming liability for its public spaces, a change that the institution is strenuously resisting.

The New York Times

The States General then forced him to conclude the Treaty of Tübingen, whereby, in return for their assuming liability for his debts, he granted them important rights.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In Manitoba, the Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate, a Roman Catholic order, want to hand over to the federal government virtually all their property in the province in return for Ottawa's assuming liability for about 2,000 claims against the order.

The New York Times

Moreover, South Dakota has invested $35 million in rehabilitating the mine--as well as assuming liability for the site.

Science Magazine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

It assumed liability for some asbestos claims when it bought Dresser Industries for $6.2 billion in stock and assumed debt in 1998.

The New York Times

It was forced to assume liability for any further expenses or lawsuits and to reimburse the county $16 million.

The New York Times

Senator Tom Daschle, the Democratic leader, was the chief sponsor of the bill, under which the government will assume liability for any environmental damage.

The New York Times

The Trump Organization, he said, has been waiting for the city's assurance that it would assume liability for any accidents that occur on the path, which would run between a crumbling waterfront and a construction zone.

The New York Times

Under the agreement, the county would assume liability for injuries on and off the trail from dawn to dusk and for injuries on the trail at all times, authority and government officials said.

The New York Times

At O'Hare, the final agreement between the city and the security agency was not signed until this afternoon because lawyers for both sides could not agree on language designating who would assume liability for incidents at the checkpoints, Mr. Walker said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "assuming liability for", clearly define the scope and limitations of the liability being assumed to avoid future disputes. For instance, specify the types of damages or incidents covered and any relevant timeframes.

Common error

Avoid using "assuming liability for" without clearly specifying what the liability entails. Ambiguous language can lead to unintended responsibilities or legal challenges. Always define the specific risks and potential costs associated with the assumed liability.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "assuming liability for" functions as a gerund phrase, acting as a noun that describes the action of taking responsibility for something. It often appears in legal and contractual contexts, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples, to indicate the acceptance of legal or financial obligations.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Encyclopedias

20%

Science

20%

Less common in

Wiki

20%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "assuming liability for" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. Although its frequency is uncommon, the phrase is used to denote the acceptance of responsibility, typically in formal and legal settings. It's crucial to clearly define the scope of liability when using this phrase to avoid ambiguity and potential disputes. Related phrases include "accepting responsibility for" and "becoming liable for". The phrase appears most frequently in News & Media, Encyclopedia, and Scientific sources. When writing, ensure the context is appropriate for this relatively formal expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

becoming liable for

A more formal and legalistic way of expressing the same concept.

taking legal responsibility for

Directly addresses the legal aspect of assuming responsibility.

accepting responsibility for

Focuses on the general act of taking responsibility, without necessarily implying a legal obligation.

agreeing to be liable for

Emphasizes the agreement or consent to be responsible.

becoming accountable for

Stresses the aspect of being answerable or responsible for outcomes.

bearing the responsibility for

Highlights the act of carrying the weight of responsibility.

taking on the onus of

Emphasizes the burden or obligation being assumed.

committing to be responsible for

Highlights the commitment to take responsibility.

taking financial responsibility for

Specifically refers to financial obligations.

shouldering the burden of

Implies a heavy or difficult responsibility.

FAQs

What does "assuming liability for" mean in a legal context?

In a legal context, "assuming liability for" means that a party is agreeing to be legally responsible for certain obligations, debts, or damages. This can arise from contracts, agreements, or specific legal duties. It implies that the party will be held accountable for any related consequences.

What are some alternatives to "assuming liability for" that I can use?

You can use alternatives like "accepting responsibility for", "becoming liable for", or "taking on the onus of" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How does "assuming liability for" differ from "insuring against" a risk?

"Assuming liability for" means directly accepting responsibility for potential damages or losses. "Insuring against" a risk involves purchasing an insurance policy to cover potential losses, thereby transferring the financial burden to the insurance company, instead of directly assuming it.

Can I limit the extent of "assuming liability for" in a contract?

Yes, you can limit the extent of "assuming liability for" by including specific clauses in the contract that define the scope, duration, and maximum amount of liability. It's crucial to clearly outline these limitations to avoid unintended or excessive responsibility.