The phrase "assuming a case" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing hypothetical situations or scenarios in which certain conditions are taken for granted.
Example: "Assuming a case where the economy improves, we can expect an increase in consumer spending."
Alternatives: "considering a scenario" or "in the event of a situation".
4. Experiment method: The object transport experiment was done assuming a case where during the object-tilting operation, the outrigger of the object-tilting robot is deployed.
ThingMagic has a stop-gap solution: Rather than recognizing individual tags, its prototype readers monitor which cases sit on which pallets, thus assuming a case went by when its pallet goes by.
Assuming a case of metabolic complementation between the bacteria and its host where mevalonate is a metabolite supplied by the host, a transport flux that allow the uptake of mevalonate by the cell was incorporated to the model.
Assuming a case fatality rate of 80% [ 2, 5], it can be predicted that 16 per 100,000 infants would die of disseminated BCG infection in a population with this level of risk.
Assuming a case-to-infection ratio for wild type 2 of 1∶1,000, the 30 reported cases alone are likely to be associated with around 30,000 infections (figure 7).
Assuming a case-fatality rate 50% lower than the actual rate, the model yields a cost per life-year gained of US$8,566 (a 100% increase), and assuming a case-fatality-rate twice the actual rate, the cost per life-year gained is US$2,142 (a 50% decrease).
The study was designed to detect an effect size [odds ratio (OR)] of 2.5, with a power of 80%% at a two-sided significance level of 0.05 assuming a case-to-control ratio of 1 1.
Mr. Davis, the Rams' lawyer, said: "It's reasonable to assume a case like this coming at some point.
(The reported appearance of the "Queen of the Night" at Beethoven's bedside was sufficiently surprising that many biographers, Swafford included, assume a case of mistaken identity).
For simplicity, assume a case in which the integrated hazard functions for targets A and B are identical, both with distractors (H AX (t) = H XB (t)), and without (H A (t) = H B (t)).
Though the idea was initially proposed by Said et al. [31], they only assumed a case when the signal was incident from the zero direction, so that there was no need to consider the phase wrapping effects.
