The phrase "assumes dramatic" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It may be intended to describe a situation or context where something is taken for granted in a dramatic manner, but it needs additional context to be meaningful.
Example: "The film assumes dramatic tension between the characters, which keeps the audience engaged."
Alternatives: "takes on a dramatic" or "implies a dramatic".
They assume dramatic force.
In the worst case, assuming dramatic climate change, governments will surely add to the chaos rather than help alleviate it.
Both dances and journeys send people moving from one place to another, and the departures and arrivals can assume dramatic, emotional and spiritual significance.
On the other hand, should you seek a demonstration of female centrality not the empowerment of women so much as the instinctive power with which, whether in suffering or in flourishes of joy, they can assume dramatic command of a movie then the Bergman season, I would argue, will be the better and more inspiring option.
In its last report the Paris based International Energy Agency (IEA) claimed that to have a decent chance of avoiding catastrophic climate change only half of our existing proven reserves of oil and gas can be burnt by 2050 - even assuming dramatic cuts in global coal use and the deployment of carbon capture technologies.
The groups of students responsible for 'T' thefts generally assume dramatic pseudonyms, such as the "Mystic Marauders" or the "Sneaky Four".
In contrast with most of Handel's oratorios, the singers in Messiah do not assume dramatic roles; there is no single, dominant narrative voice; and very little use is made of quoted speech.
Particularly black fringe, which, in contrast to spring's garden party of florals, assumes a dramatic flair.
The movie is austere in emotional content - as if it assumes, in dramatic terms, the cold impartiality that CBS boss Bill Paley Frank Langellaaccusesses Murrow of neglecting.
The authors of the new study, Steven Smith and Andrew Mizrahi, both climate analysts at the Joint Global Change Research Institute in College Park, Maryland, argue that for one thing, the earlier work assumes that dramatic cuts in methane and soot emissions are feasible based on shifting technologies and changes in human behavior.
