The phrase "assumed type" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to programming, data types, or any situation where a type is taken for granted or inferred without explicit declaration.
Example: "In this function, the assumed type of the variable will determine how the data is processed."
Alternatives: "inferred type" or "implied type".
The assumed type 1 error is 5%.
The power calculated with an assumed type 1 error rate (not the real type 1 error rate) was higher with the regression method than with the FASTA method for low (large families) to moderate (small families) heritability values.
An a priori power analysis [ 14] with an assumed Type I error of 0.05 and a Type II error rate of 0.20 (80% statistical power) was calculated for measures of trunk muscle strength [ 12] and revealed that 13 participants per group would be sufficient to observe medium "Time x Group" interaction effects.
*see text: total population size = 600 with 120, 20 and 10 sires that respectively produced 5, 30 and 60 offspring, MAF of SNP 0.5, QTL effect 2% of phenotypic variance, assumed type 1 error rate 5%, heritability from 0 to 1 in steps of 0.1.
For example, with the regression method and for h = 0.50, families of 60 half-sibs and an assumed type 1 error rate of 1%, true type 1 error rate was 11.9% with a total sample of 600 animals and 12.6% with 6000 animals.
These calculations assumed type I and type II error rates of 10% (i.e., there is ⩾90% probability that the regimen would be recommended for further study if the true efficacy rate is ⩾50%and<10%0% probability if the true efficacy rate is ⩽30%).
Assuming type I statistical error of 5% and two-tailed statistical test, this study was designed to have a power of 90% based on previous study [18].
We assume type 2 diabetes as the articles references refer to type 2 diabetes studies.
The distance-dependent stochastic block model assumes type depends on distance, the traditional stochastic block model has no notion of distance, the mixed membership block model assumes type is combinatorial, and the latent position cluster model assumes that type is clustered-but-continuous.
Assuming type I error was not >2.5%, a sample of 72 patients would provide >80% power to test the hypothesis using exact binomial test.
A two-stage minimax study design was used to differentiate between response rates (CR + PR) of 10%and26%6% assuming type I and II error rates of 10%155.
