The phrase "assumed statements" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to statements that are taken for granted or accepted without proof in a discussion or argument.
Example: "In our analysis, we must clarify the assumed statements that underpin our conclusions to ensure transparency."
Alternatives: "presumed assertions" or "accepted claims".
And while that is true in some cases, it should not be a default and assumed statement.
A possibility exists, not used here, to take into account some knowledge about the environment in an assume statement; observers can be used to have objective like: always having a task t1 between t2 and t3".
It is often assumed that statements or conclusions concerning the efficacy are solely related to IV, and EV can only be used to generate statements concerning the extent of validity (or limits of generalisation).
It then looks more specifically at the right to education, and why it cannot be assumed that statements of rights deliver what they promise.
It is reasonable to assume that statements such as the above sent a strong signal to market participants.
Hence there can no such thing as the misapplication of a name (since a misapplied name is not a name, but a mere sound), and hence no such thing as a false statement, since (it is assumed) every false statement involves the misapplication of some name.
Two path costs are compared using an if-statement, assumed to count one instruction.
It is assumed that all statements to be evaluated have prior probability greater than zero and less than one.
The independence statements assumed by a PSG allow it to compactly specify the probabilities of all possible isoforms.
*Literature estimates show the range of incubation periods consistent with most published estimates and the most frequently stated central tendency (eg. median, mean) for the incubation period; estimates that did not specify a type (eg. "the incubation period is 5 days") were assumed to be statements of central tendency.
