The phrase "assumed facts" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing information that is taken for granted or accepted as true without proof in a particular context.
Example: "In our analysis, we must clarify the assumed facts that underpin our conclusions."
Alternatives: "presumed facts" or "accepted truths".
"These letters do not render an opinion on actual facts, but on assumed facts," Mr. Tucker said.
"However, the assumed facts of this case demonstrate that Mrs Roberts was not subjected to section 60 because of her ethnicity.
The president of the IPT, Mr Justice Burton, said the tribunal was "unique on being able to hear cases on the basis of assumed facts".
5 The assumed facts of the landmark case in the English law of negligence Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 (House of Lords).
In State v Brown for example, the assumed facts were that the defendant beat his wife when she drank alcohol, doing so at her prior request, as she thought this would be the most effective way to cure her severe alcoholism.
Within this cell, it is not about living by faith, but living by their assumed facts.
This Article provides a case study of compensation at Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers during 2000-2008 and concludes that this assumed fact is incorrect.
Under the rule, an assumed fact must be taken to exist if evidence contrary to the assumed fact does not create a genuine issue of fact; i.e. if "reasonable men would not differ as to the existence or non-existence of the presumed fact". Id.; Harvey v. Craw, 110 N.J.
In the ongoing debate about regulatory responses to the financial crisis, commentators have used this assumed fact as a basis for dismissing both the role of compensation structures in inducing risk-taking and the potential value of reforming such structures.
The assumed fact that the person would waive her right clearly does not settle the matter of whether she was wronged by having been brought into existence (Harman 2004, 89 101; Liberto 2014, 79 80).
"[Marriott] turns initial speculation into assumed fact and presents a wodge of information that leads nowhere," the reviewer complained.
