The phrase "assumed beforehand" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that was taken for granted or accepted as true prior to a certain point in time or event.
Example: "The results of the experiment were based on several variables that were assumed beforehand."
Alternatives: "presumed in advance" or "taken for granted".
This year's Glastonbury, I assumed beforehand, would have little to distinguish it.
The strength design of heat-transfer surfaces composed of transverse finning tubes, in general, refers to the determination of the allowable wall thickness of the finned tubes, corresponding to the operating conditions and the selected material, and its comparison with the nominal wall thickness, assumed beforehand in constructive characteristics of the heat-transfer surface.
Late in the 20th century, the bed rest trial showed evidence that the diagnostic value of classical neurological signs is not as accurate as was assumed beforehand [ 18].
This perception can pose a significant barrier to the teaching of evolution and other sciences if students assume beforehand that the topic contradicts what they are supposed to believe from a religious standpoint.
Now, to assume beforehand that the classical, Boolean account of negation is the correct one, in the sense that it captures how negation works in the vernacular, again begs the question against the dialetheist (and, indeed, against most non-classical logicians): one cannot just assume that classical negation gets it right.
Note, that (x^{N}) is guaranteed to be both sparse (i.e., band limited) and zero in all coefficients outside the band limited area, R. Thus, unlike the DCT solution, there is no need to assume beforehand which coefficients are outside R and no need to zero them.
Tertiles were analyzed as nominal categories, that is, we did not assume beforehand monotonic relationships between nutrient intakes and outcome measure.
So the argument of the COSMIN panel is that the effect size only has meaning as a measure of responsiveness if we know (or assume) beforehand what the magnitude of the effect of the intervention is.
I can tell you that without knowing the price beforehand, I assumed it'd retail for around $50 when I first took it out of the box and set it up.
The function depends on the parameters Δ t j, α j, β ij, σ o, j 2 and the CRF γ(x), hence beforehand, we assumed that the CRF was known.
For the underlying problem, the dense part of the scene corresponds to the building layout and the support of the corresponding part of the image is assumed to be known beforehand.
