In the first scenario, we assumed unknown sensor variances and evaluated the performance of the Rao-Blackwellized ReDif-PF and two consensus-based PF trackers using respectively iterative minimum consensus (CbPFa) and flooding (CbPFb) (see also[11]).
To evaluate the effect of transmitted alleles on the risk of ASD, the primary analyses assume an additive model and evaluated four overlapping data sets: two levels of diagnosis (spectrum versus strict diagnosis) by two levels of ancestry (all ancestries versus European ancestry).
Normality was assumed and significance (P < 0.05) was evaluated using either unpaired t-tests or one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests, where appropriate.
Using PCA based reconstruction, the error in calculations, if an epidermal thickness of d = 0.06mm is assumed, was evaluated using image sets with both, uniform and spatially varying, epidermal thickness.
Such bias is also seen in the method where the cutoff point is selected in a way that maximizes the sum of SE and SP. Linnet and Brandt calculated the sample distribution of (SE + SP /2 in the case of dichotomization using computer simulation assuming that distributions are normal, and evaluated the positive bias induced by the selection of an optimal cutoff point [ 4].
FDI performances of the original alarm system for all assumed malfunctions are evaluated and alarm signal selection and limit settings are reconsidered according to the evaluation results.
It was also assumed that evaluating the costs and consequences over a time horizon of six years after birth would be sufficient since this is the age when lung function tests would be first reliable in children.
To mimic the assumed iron-depleted condition and evaluate its linkage to the iron-regulated gene expression, B. cenocepacia J2315 was grown in minimal media BSM with no iron salts added (4.1 × 10-6 M available iron; 0.2 ppm) and the expression of BCAL0270 quantitated as an iron marker gene.
are often assumed but not evaluated.
Notably, maximum parsimony inference is conducted under a specific cost matrix, but these costs are assumed rather than evaluated from the data.
from Blaser et al. (2010), in which the L and W were independently related to M W. The width, length, and average slip of each earthquake can therefore be derived from the earthquake's magnitude using Eqs. 1, 2, 3, and 4. The slip distribution during each rupture must be assumed to evaluate the slip history of the slab surface.
