The phrase "assume firm" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express a concept related to taking a strong or confident stance, but as it stands, it lacks clarity and context.
Example: "In order to move forward, we must assume firm control over the project."
Alternatives: "take a strong position" or "adopt a firm stance."
Let's be clear, we're going to assume that Firm 1s moving first and the other firm we'll assume Firm 1's going to move first the other firm, Firm 2, is going to get observe what Firm 1 has chosen and then get to make her choice.
Assume firm X invests first and firm Y, on seeing X's move, follows up.
Assume firm X encounters a decision whether to take on an investment project.
One way is to assume firm specific thresholds that are, e.g., normally distributed.
Assume Firm A issues a normal bond with a YTM of 7% and Firm B issues a callable bond with a YTM of 7.5% and a YTC of 8%.
Using an economist's hypothetical perspective, one would assume firms and workers in the losing industry move to the exporting sector and take advantage of the gains from trade.
The High Pay Commission's complaints only make sense if you assume firms don't actually care about making money — which is to say, they don't make sense at all".
As well, (alpha_{NS}^ (X|theta,II)) depicts the entrance level that firm X will invest under Nash equilibrium, depending on firm X's having incomplete information and assuming firm Y's cost is (gamma_{H}) with probability (theta.) From (61), we have frac{{partial alpha_{NS}^ (X|theta,II)}}{partial theta } = - (gamma_{H} - gamma_{L} ),<,0 (65).
(alpha_{NS}^ (X|gamma_{H},FI)) stands for the entrance level that firm X will invest under Nash equilibrium, dependent on firm X's having full information and assuming firm Y's cost is (gamma_{H}) with a probability (theta = 1).
After a lengthy injury delay, which ended with Diamond Bar's Michelle Stelzriede being taken away in an ambulance after apparently hurting her neck in a collision just five minutes into the second half, Prep took the lead within four minutes of the resumption of play and assumed firm control of the match.
The problem with this story is that it assumes firms have the flexibility to switch easily between labor and capital.
