Sentence examples for associations t from inspiring English sources

As predicted, compared to teenagers, children supplied fewer semantic associations (t(28) = 3.459, p<0.001; power = 0.83), and judged odors less familiar (F[1,28] = 4.5, p<0.05; power = 0.525) (Figure 4c), and expressed more difficulty in supplying any semantic or emotional associations (t(28) = 2.614, p<0.008; power = 0.63) (Figure 5c).

In contrast, rats in the LEC lesion group showed no such preference for exploring novel OP associations (t(12)=0.622, P = 0.545).

In contrast, rats in the LEC lesion group showed no such preference for novel OPC associations (t(12)=−1.576, P = 0.141).

Rats in the LEC lesion group, however, showed no preference for novel versus familiar object-context associations (t(12) = −1.297, P = 0.219) demonstrating a critical role for the LEC in processing objects in context.

Rats in the novel OCR group (Fig. 1A; top row) explored the novel configurations of objects and contexts in preference to previously experienced configurations and thus demonstrated memory for object-context associations (t(7) = 8.714, P < 0.001; Figs. 1B,C).

Students from Nanjing University in China took an Implicit Associations Test (IAT), which measured their automatic, unconscious feelings about things associated with built environments (i.e., cars, streets, buildings) versus natural environments (animals, birds, trees).

Human thought is constrained by a relatively small set of permanent principles of imaginative association (T, 10, 225; EHU, 24).

The adjusted multiple regression model showed no indication of an association (t = –0.28, P = 0.783).

Sex and cognitive empathy had significant statistical association (t = −3.12, df = 37, P-value < 0.05).

Whether students are living at home or not had significant statistical association (t = 2.25, df = 207, P-value < 0.05).

Under the null hypothesis of no association, T CF is distributed as a central χ(1) distribution.