The phrase "associates per" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express a ratio or a measurement related to associates, but it lacks context to be usable.
Example: "The company has a high number of associates per project, indicating strong collaboration."
Alternatives: "associates for each" or "associates per unit".
Less than 20 percent of these associates will work in grocery, which represents about 80 or 90 associates per store.
Furthermore, because results are identical between CON and MOD when there were one or two associates per hosts, CON distances were not calculated.
An example of the latter approach, restricted to up to two associates per host, is presented in the study of Joly and Bruneau [ 33].
In contrast to the Acer, Fagus and Zelkova datasets (in which the number of associates per host is determined by the experimental success in PCR, cloning and sequencing) in the Rosa datasets, the number of associates per host represents the alleged number of alleles (one or two) per individual.
Because the distance function described in [ 33] uses averaging, MIN results are different in the case of two associates per host, unless the distances to the two distinct associates are identical.
Plant specimens' iDV inferred from distances matrices obtained with four different transformation methods are compared; gaps were treated as missing data and a minimum number of three associates per host was applied.
Each node A which receives a HELLO message from node B, measures the SINR of the link in order to analytically calculate the associated PER by means of a formula of the type PER=f SINR) where the function f depends on the modulation, the transmitted energy per bit, the coding, etc. (all the typical parameters of a radio communication channel).
One widely accepted format is the multiview video plus depth (MVD) format [7], which consists of textures and the associated per-pixel depth data (the latter describes the geometric relationship between objects in the scene and the capturing cameras [8]).
For S3, we present the optimal screening rates with all possible screening initiation ages, as well as the associated per-capita cumulative cost and terminal prevalence in Fig. 6.
We associate a per unit of time delay cost d i, j of task j allocation on container i.
In this case the number of water molecules associated per dendrimer molecule varied from 10,450 to 9,200.
