The phrase "associated sentences" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to sentences that are related or connected in meaning or context.
Example: "In the analysis, we will examine the associated sentences to understand the overall theme of the text."
Alternatives: "related sentences" or "connected sentences".
Numerous studies associated sentence length with improper considerations, such as the offender's race.
Each candidate relation included a set of features that provided textual information about the co-occurring gene pair from the associated sentence.
For instance, Lewis isolates a self-perpetuating communicative mechanism that systematically associates sentences with propositional contents.
Is an algorithm that correctly associates sentences with truth-conditions (relative to contexts) necessary and/or sufficient for being an adequate theory of meaning?
The descriptive conventions associate sentences with (types of) ways for things to be: ways for situations, things, events, etc. to be.
A number of studies have used functional neuroimaging to examine the neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension; however, few fMRI studies have examined activation patterns associated with sentence comprehension after accounting for activation attributable to single-word-level tasks important for sentence comprehension.
To investigate the patterns of activation associated with sentence comprehension after controlling for single word reading and maintaining single words in memory, 20 unimpaired adult readers completed a block design paradigm which included sentence comprehension, single word reading, and short-term memory (for words) tasks.
So the diagonal intension associated with sentence 'Hesperus ≠ Phosphorus' will be necessarily false when it's asserted in philosophical contexts (i.e., it will be false when uttered in any situation compatible with what is being presupposed in the philosophical conversation).
This task engages semantic processing regions along the temporal and inferior parietal cortices associated with sentence comprehension, and inferior frontal and inferior parietal regions associated with semantic predictions and word retrieval (Gaillard et al., 2007; Berl et al., 2014).
Thus, for example, participants were first exposed to all three sentences associated with the creature "Lelop" (see sentences (4) to (6) above), then to all three sentences associated with "Filan", and so on, imitating the strophe-based structure of a children's song, a poem, or a pun or language play.
Perhaps the structural mismatches between sentences of a natural language and sentences of a Fregean Begriffsschrift are so severe that one cannot formulate general rules for associating the sentences we ordinarily use with propositions.
