The phrase "associated excluded" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe something that is excluded in relation to something else, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear.
Example: "The report did not include the associated excluded data, which was crucial for the analysis."
Alternatives: "related excluded" or "connected omitted".
†A total of 215 isolates associated with excluded clusters were removed from study isolate total (n = 4,018).
However, threats to this study include potential bias associated with excluded records, unknown status of absconds and lack of control over the quality of the measurements that were made at admission.
Four of the five dimensions and 12 of the 15 items contribute to the preference-based index score, with the illness dimension and associated items excluded because they are indicative of an underlying health condition rather than the impact of that health condition on HRQoL.
UNA-USA's Jeff Laurenti notes the problems associated with excluding undemocratic countries from membership: "It is one thing to deny membership to a few small "rogue" dictatorships.
PPIs were not significantly associated when excluding patients with gastrointestinal reflux disease or functional dyspepsia.
However, Harniss et al. [ 25] point out that accommodations, such as the formatting and administration methods our participants suggested, can also reduce the bias associated with excluding a large number of people from using PROMs.
In addition, stockings carry a significant cost, particularly in respect of the nursing time associated with excluding contraindications before their application, and with ensuring they are properly applied and remain correctly positioned without complications.
To minimize possible bias associated with excluding individuals with missing data while maintaining power, we imputed data for missing chemical exposures stemming from insufficient urine for quantification and relevant covariates (10%%) using data for the entire cohort and Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, under an assumption of 'missing at random' [ 32, 33].
As expected, confidence intervals estimated from the sensitivity analyses were generally wider, since the analyses involved the inevitable reduction in power associated with excluding events (analyses i and ii), calculating robust standard errors (analysis iii), and using smaller case-control sets (analyses iv and v).
The redundant counterparts of several associated markers were excluded from association mapping for the simplicity of the analyses and computation efficiency.
