The phrase "associate reviewer" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a person who assists or collaborates with a primary reviewer in evaluating submissions, such as academic papers or grant proposals.
Example: "As an associate reviewer, I provided feedback on the manuscript before it was sent to the lead reviewer."
Alternatives: "co-reviewer" or "supporting reviewer".
The inclusion of the studies was discussed with associate reviewers (DB and JS) until consensus was reached.
Lest it sound that I am complaining rather too much, let me end this brief section with a word on the unfailing politeness and cooperation of perhaps 99percentt of our associate editors, reviewers, and authors.15 I often ask associate editors to recommend possible reviewers, especially when a paper is on an area geographical or theoretical somewhat removed from my own interests and expertise.
We question whether (associate) editors, reviewers and researchers receive sufficient incentives and are motivated to design robust and valid research (see also Lin & Sanders, 2014).
We recognise the potential for bias associated with the second reviewer reviewing a random sample of the search records (10% of the total), and independently extracting data from a random sample of included studies (10% of the total, and all 21 randomised controlled trials).
Her gravelly voice, with its uniquely Midwestern combination of flatness and warmth, comes across devoid of the authority associated with reviewers.
He also participates in scholarship in the field through work as an editorial board member, associate editor, test reviewer, and newsletter editor.
We work closely with the associate editors and reviewers to ensure timely reviews, as a result of which it has been possible to provide authors with feedback very quickly (on the order of 6 weeks).
Answer e-correspondence from contributors, reviewers, associate editors, guest editors, and other inquirers, independently and in a timely way (same day if possible).
Thus, the objective of this study is to understand if factors specific to either the deceased or to the respondent of the VA are associated with physician reviewer's agreement on cause of death.
Associate editors and reviewers need to be instructed to consider experimental design as part of the peer-review process.
