assists for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "assists for" is not standard in written English and may be considered incorrect.
It is not commonly used, and its meaning can be unclear without proper context. Example: "He assists for the local charity organization during events."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

But I'm getting more assists for sure.

Independent

Donald Audette added two assists for Atlanta.

The New York Times - Sports

Pascal Dupuis had two assists for Minnesota.

The New York Times - Sports

Peter Forsberg added two assists for Colorado.

The New York Times - Sports

Darryl Sydor had two assists for Dallas.

The New York Times - Sports

Mitch Johnson had 16 assists for Stanford.

The New York Times - Sports

Phil Pressey had 18 points and 8 assists for Missouri.

The New York Times - Sports

He added two assists for a game-high 3 points.

The New York Times - Sports

Rose also had 12 assists for his seventh double-double.

The New York Times - Sports

Matt Cullen had a goal and two assists for Ottawa.

The New York Times

Dustin Byfuglien had two assists for the Jets.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing assistance, prioritize using the standard preposition "with" instead of "for" to ensure grammatical correctness. For example, say "assists with the project".

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "assists for" as it's not considered standard English. Opt for "assists with" or rephrase the sentence to use alternatives like "provides assistance to" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "assists for" functions as a prepositional phrase, indicating the beneficiary or purpose of the assistance. However, according to Ludwig AI, this usage is considered non-standard. Most examples from Ludwig show it used in the context of sports statistics, particularly in relation to hockey and basketball.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Wiki

15%

Science

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "assists for" is frequently found in news and sports reporting, particularly when detailing player statistics. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically non-standard; the preposition "with" is typically preferred. While prevalent in certain contexts, opting for alternatives such as ""assists with"", "provides assistance to", or "helps with" ensures greater clarity and grammatical accuracy, especially in formal writing. Always consider the audience and context when choosing between commonly used but technically incorrect phrases and their more grammatically sound counterparts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assists with

This alternative uses the more common preposition "with" instead of "for" after "assists".

provides assistance to

This phrase replaces "assists" with a more formal and grammatically sound expression.

offers assistance to

This is a more formal way of saying "assists", using "offers assistance" instead.

gives support to

This alternative uses the word "support" instead of "assistance", and "to" instead of "for".

is helpful to

This alternative highlights the helpfulness provided.

helps with

This phrase uses the verb "helps" which is a simpler and more direct alternative.

aids in

This uses "aids" which is similar to "assists" but employs the preposition "in".

facilitates

This single-word alternative conveys the idea of making something easier or assisting in its progress.

contributes to

This alternative emphasizes the contribution aspect of assisting.

lends a hand to

This phrase offers an idiomatic way of expressing assistance.

FAQs

How to use "assists" correctly in a sentence?

The verb "assist" is typically followed by the preposition "with". For example, "He "assists with" the event planning."

What can I say instead of "assists for"?

Alternatives include ""assists with"", "provides assistance to", or "helps with" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "assists for" or "assists with"?

"Assists with" is the grammatically correct choice. "Assists for" is generally considered non-standard.

Is "assists for" ever correct?

While not standard, "assists for" might appear in informal contexts. However, for professional and formal writing, it's best to use ""assists with"" or a similar alternative.