assisted with the interpretation of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "assisted with the interpretation of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing someone who has helped or contributed to understanding or explaining something, often in academic or professional contexts. Example: "The researcher assisted with the interpretation of the data collected during the study, providing valuable insights into the findings."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

CR and PvM assisted with the interpretation of the data.

BMC Family Practice

Karim Tabiti assisted with the interpretation of the LightCycler data.

BMC Clinical Pathology

RDP assisted with the interpretation of the experimental data.

BMC Systems Biology

MR reviewed the included articles and assisted with the interpretation of the results.

BMC Psychiatry

SRY and JWC performed the flow cytometry and assisted with the interpretation of data.

BMC Pediatrics

MP assisted with the interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript.

BMC Pediatrics

DF assisted with the interpretation of data and contributed to the draft of the manuscript.

BMC Cancer

MN assisted with the interpretation of the results and revised the manuscript.

Critical Care

MC and TCM undertook the statistical analysis. ET assisted with the interpretation of data.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

MHC conducted the cost-effectiveness analysis, and assisted with the interpretation of the results.

BMC Health Services Research

HK assisted with the interpretation of the results and helped draft the manuscript.

BMC Psychiatry

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When crediting contributions in academic writing, use "assisted with the interpretation of" to precisely acknowledge help in understanding data or results.

Common error

Avoid using "assisted with the interpretation of" if the individual was solely responsible for the interpretation. Use stronger verbs like "interpreted" or "analyzed" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "assisted with the interpretation of" functions as a verb phrase, specifically indicating a supportive role in the process of understanding and explaining data or findings. Ludwig AI provides examples showcasing its use in crediting contributions to research and analysis.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "assisted with the interpretation of" is a grammatically correct and frequently used verb phrase primarily found in scientific literature. According to Ludwig AI, it's used to credit contributions to understanding data. It maintains a formal register and implies a supportive role in data analysis, not necessarily sole responsibility. The phrase is most common in scientific contexts, as seen in the provided examples, making it a valuable tool for precise and professional communication in research.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

facilitated the interpretation of

Stresses making the interpretation process easier.

supported the understanding of

Highlights the act of providing support for comprehension.

helped clarify the meaning

Emphasizes making the meaning more understandable.

aided in deciphering

Focuses on resolving complex or unclear elements.

provided assistance in understanding

Offers a more formal tone highlighting the supportive role.

contributed to the explanation of

Focuses on adding to the overall explanatory narrative.

played a role in interpreting

Suggests a contribution, possibly not the sole effort.

collaborated on the analysis of

Highlights a joint effort in breaking down the data.

helped to unpack

Indicates assistance in dissecting a complex matter.

worked on the elucidation of

Focuses on shedding light and making something clear.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "assisted with the interpretation of"?

You can use phrases like "helped clarify the meaning", "facilitated the interpretation of", or "supported the understanding of" depending on the context.

Is it appropriate to use "assisted with the interpretation of" in formal writing?

Yes, "assisted with the interpretation of" is appropriate for formal writing, especially in academic or scientific contexts where precise attribution of contributions is important.

What is the difference between "assisted with the interpretation of" and "interpreted"?

"Interpreted" implies sole responsibility for the interpretation, while "assisted with the interpretation of" indicates a supporting role in the interpretation process.

How do I properly credit someone who "assisted with the interpretation of" data in my research paper?

In the acknowledgments or author contributions section, explicitly state that the person "assisted with the interpretation of" the data, specifying their contributions if necessary.