assistant with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "assistant with" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey assistance in a specific context, but it lacks clarity and completeness. Example: "I need an assistant with organizing the event."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He silenced one assistant with colorful language.

The New York Times - Sports

Q. You've been an assistant with three N.B.A. teams.

The New York Times

(He did as an assistant with the Ravens).

The New York Times - Sports

Mourinho started as a coaching assistant with Barça.

The New York Times - Sports

Karl hired Casey as an assistant with the Seattle SuperSonics.

The New York Times - Sports

Peterson served as an administrative assistant with Memphis last season.

The New York Times - Sports

He was an assistant with the Lakers this season.

The New York Times - Sports

An assistant with the Los Angeles Lakers last season, Clifford was also an assistant with the Knicks for three years.

The New York Times - Sports

Ewing was an assistant with the Washington Wizards this season.

The New York Times - Sports

MacLean, now an assistant with the Devils, had 75.

The New York Times - Sports

O'Neill was an assistant with the Memphis Grizzlies last season.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the assistance someone provides, consider using more precise prepositions such as "in" or "with" followed by a specific noun or gerund. This improves clarity and grammatical correctness. For example, instead of saying "an assistant with the project", try "an assistant in managing the project" or "an assistant with project management".

Common error

Avoid using "assistant with" as a catch-all phrase. Instead, be specific about the type of assistance provided. Saying "an assistant with tasks" is vague. Clarify it: "an assistant with administrative tasks" or "an assistant in organizing tasks".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "assistant with" functions as part of a noun phrase, typically modifying a noun (e.g., "research assistant") to indicate the area of assistance. Despite its frequent usage, Ludwig AI suggests this phrase is not correct in standard written English, lacking clarity and completeness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

38%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Reference

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "assistant with" is frequently used across various contexts, particularly in news and media as shown by Ludwig's examples, it is considered grammatically incorrect and less precise. Ludwig AI recommends using alternatives like "assistance in" or rephrasing sentences to improve clarity and correctness. Using more specific descriptions of the role or task at hand is advisable, especially in formal or professional writing to avoid ambiguity and ensure grammatical accuracy. Better choices include saying like: "She provides assistance in marketing" or "She is an assistant specializing in marketing.".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

help with

A more direct and common way to express assistance.

assistance in

Replaces "with" to focus on the area where assistance is provided.

support with

Emphasizes the supporting role in a task or activity.

aid in

A more formal way of saying assistance.

work with

Suggests collaboration and contribution to a task.

facilitation in

Highlights the role of making a process easier.

associate with

Indicates a professional relationship or partnership.

backing in

Emphasis is on backing or support in something.

collaborate with

Highlights a joint effort or cooperative project.

liaise with

Implies acting as a communication link or coordinator.

FAQs

What is a more grammatically correct way to say "assistant with"?

Instead of "assistant with", consider using phrases like "assistance in", "help with", or specifying the area of assistance, such as "assistant in project management".

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "assistant with"?

While commonly used, "assistant with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use more precise phrases like "assistant in", or rephrase the sentence for clarity.

How can I rephrase a sentence using "assistant with" to be more precise?

Instead of "She is an assistant with marketing", try "She provides assistance in marketing" or "She is an assistant specializing in marketing."

What are some alternatives to "assistant with" that sound more professional?

Consider using "support with", "aid in", or specifying the role directly, such as "project assistant" or "administrative assistant" depending on the context.