The second typology highlights a similar composition in the access to polices, which points out a higher percentage in the case of young families: but, in this case, a significant contribution to the phenomenon is given by the presence/absence of an exclusive assistant (Table 4).
Complete assessment included a one hour medical assessment by a paediatrician/neonatologist experienced in the follow-up evaluation, a 1.5-hour neuromotor assessment by a paediatric physiotherapist, and a three hour neuropsychological assessment by a psychologist or psychological test assistant (Table 1).
The IDIs and FGDs were carried out in Swahili by the first author with the assistance of a Tanzanian research assistant (Tables 1 and 2).
The logistic model applied to the second type of family farms gives other interesting insights, due to the presence of an assistant (Tables 8 and 9).
They acted as project advocates, interpreters, helped with practical local navigation issues, facilitated community consultation and negotiation, and in some cases were employed as paid assistants (Table 1).
Field observations (total duration 78 hours) and individual interviews were conducted on 17 occasions with the four patients and 12 HC assistants (Table 2).
According to the analysis, TE was not related to the age of dentists, the age of patients, or the age of assistants (Table 5).
Of 51 dispensers in the control arm and 59 in the intervention arm, ∼80% in both arms were female and had a low-level medical qualification, mostly nurse assistants (Table 2).
The course is graduate level, and most students have been graduate students, but participants have included upper level undergraduates, physicians in residency and fellowship training, postdoctoral fellows, academic staff and assistant professors (Table 2).
Data were collected on 127 training programs organized by 52 training institutions, including 11 medical programs, 51 nursing programs, 30 midwifery programs, and 35 nursing assistant programs (Table 1).
130 editors were included within our final sample (95 full professors, 21 associate professors, 14 assistant professors) (Table 1).> Results showed a significant difference between the h-indices of full professors as compared to associate and assistant professor (H = 16.04; df = 2; p < .001) groups.
