The phrase "assignment percentage" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the proportion or weight of an assignment in relation to a total grade or evaluation criteria.
Example: "The assignment percentage for this project will account for 30% of your final grade."
Alternatives: "weight of the assignment" or "proportion of the assignment".
Likewise, existence of samples with a very high assignment percentage probability does not rule out an interspecific origin.
Another reason accounted for low assignment percentage was the lack of information regarding flatfish.
All other samples were either correctly assigned or left unclassified (not-assigned ), resulting in an average global accuracy of 98% and average call rate of 92% (assignment percentage).
We definitely agree that the exact temporal relationship between calls is a fascinating one, which we plan to address in a future manuscript, but we believe that the system needs additional improvements in assignment percentage before a more precise temporal analysis is appropriate.
Both SNPs and SSRs performed well in detecting the main subpopulations (K = 3): V. vinifera (Sativa and Sylvestris) and Rootstocks (Vitis ssp .. Except for K = 2, where both marker types showed a high percentage of individuals assigned to populations, all assignment percentages for the SNP dataset were lower than for the SSR dataset (Additional file 1: Table S6).
Strikingly, all assignment percentages for this data set were lower than for the SSR data set alone.
Differences in assignment percentages between SSR and SNP markers were also reported by independent studies in various maize germplasms [ 38, 48, 49] and were attributed to the greater information content of SSRs [ 50].
Differences in assignment percentages between SSR and SNP markers were also reported by several studies [ 27, 40, 41, 43] and were attributed to the higher information content of SSRs [ 43, 49].
The finalized peak lists used for the structural calculations before refinement were produced through several rounds of manual peak checks and automated unbiased NOE assignment runs using the CANDID module, aiming for optimum cycle1 and final CYANA target function values, maximum assignment percentages and numbers of generated constraints and improved structural parameters.
Examination of the differences in GO-term assignment percentages between the entire transcriptome and the DE gene sets (Supplemental Section 26, Additional file 3: Figure S11 and associated text) also revealed little agreement between the two species with respect to DE GO-term enrichment, highlighting the need for caution in interpreting our transcriptome-wide DE assessments.
The resulting distribution for the assessment of all of the company's assignments is depicted in Table 3. Table 3 Criticality of assignments based on static analysis Criticality Number of assignments Percentage Uncritical 1,087,939 92.12 Very low criticality 34,494 2.92 Low criticality 31,888 2.70 Critical 13,792 1.17 Very critical 12,851 12,851
