The phrase "assignment of the patent" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or business contexts when referring to the transfer of ownership rights of a patent from one party to another.
Example: "The assignment of the patent was finalized after both parties signed the necessary documents."
Alternatives: "transfer of the patent" or "patent assignment".
105, holding that inasmuch as respondents were estopped by Marcalus' assignment of the patent to show its validity, they could not, by recourse to the prior art to show noninfringement, accomplish the same result by indirection.
For example, assignment of the patent in exchange for equity in the company or for a share of the profits may be attractive to both parties.
We now come to the assignment of the Gegauf patent to Singer.
The issue of standing turned on the assignment and licensing of the patent: The '129 patent was acquired by Azure, a Texas limited liability company.
For such an implied restraint as is found in the assignment of a patent, purportedly valid but in fact invalid, like all reasonable restraints, does not offend the objections to unreasonable restraints.
The facts in Alice derive from the assignment of several patents from Sywcho Infrastructure Services Pty LTD to the petitioner Alice Corporation Pty Ltd.The assigned patents related to a computerized scheme for mitigating settlement risk.
While Apple's Reno office helps the company avoid state taxes, its international subsidiaries — particularly the company's assignment of sales and patent royalties to other nations — help reduce taxes owed to the American and other governments.
The four are patent volume, patent grant success rate, global reach of the patent portfolio and citations of patents.
We also discuss the implications of our study for the assignment of patents to countries based on inventor addresses.
Revised Statutes, §§ 4895, 4898, 35 U.S.C. 44, 47, 35 U.S.C.A. §§ 44, 47, authorize the assignment of an invention while the application for a patent is pending and of the patent rights to the invention after the patent has issued.
In a dissent, Justice Stephen G. Breyer said he would have returned the case to the lower courts for further consideration of two questions: the proper interpretation of the interaction of the two assignment agreements and whether the Bayh-Dole Act should be assumed to require assignment of patent rights by employees of government contractors to their employers.
