The phrase "assigned relative to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the allocation or designation of something in relation to another factor or variable.
Example: "The resources were assigned relative to the project's urgency and importance."
Alternatives: "allocated in relation to" or "designated concerning".
(The SNR value for each frequency diversity branch is given by (e.g., ).) These different SNR values for the diversity bands are assigned relative to the SNR value of the first band; for instance, for the SNR values of, the SNR value of second band is three times the first band.
The positions were assigned relative to the miR164a transcription start site.
In 227 of the matches, orientation of the cDNAs could be assigned relative to known or hypothetical loci.
The numbering of the nucleotides was assigned relative to the transcriptional start site designated in GenBank sequence.
Resonance peaks were all phased to choline-containing compounds and their chemical shifts assigned relative to that of the total choline peak at 3.2 p.p.m.
Further evidence of the breadth of lysine acetylation was provided when acetylated proteins were assigned relative to gene ontology (GO) annotations (Table 1).
To create the tool, we identified important biopsychosocial predictors, then assigned relative weights to each predictor and estimated the model's predictive performance.
Using Monte Carlo techniques, SaTScan assigned relative risk probabilities to defined block groups to detect both the location of clusters and evaluate their statistical significance.
Isocontours of equal elevations of pool margins were mapped with the TMB5 threshold, forming concentric rings that were assigned relative elevations according to the position that the pool edges intersected the reference transect.
We then assigned relative confidence scores to each isotig assembly based on these relationship classes: C1 = Highest; C2 and C3 = Higher; C4 and C5 = Medium, C6 = Lower; and C7 = Unknown.
Figure 2b shows the ranking scores, demonstrating an enhanced ability to assign relative importance to each gene and also to exclude genes with no contribution to separating the two groups, compared with the standard methodology.
