The phrase "assigned receiver" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where a specific individual or entity has been designated to receive something, such as a message, package, or information.
Example: "The package was sent to the assigned receiver, who confirmed its arrival."
Alternatives: "designated recipient" or "appointed receiver".
The Redskins were assigned receiver AKIHITO AMAYA.
The average power U k, a k of the k-th user's intended symbol, in his assigned receiver a k, on subcarrier ℓ, is given by U k, a k = p k E | h k, a k H h k, a k | 2 = p k E | α k, a k H R k, a k α k, a k | 2, (3).
Next, in order to ensure fairness among the users in terms of throughput and delay [5, 37], we enforce the constraint that each transmit signal is received with the same power in its assigned receiver, namely p i d i, a ( i ) − η = P R , ∀ i ∈ ℒ ℓ, wherein ℒ ℓ is the set of users transmitting on the ℓ-th carrier.
Osunde did what he was supposed to do on the final play against James Madison: He thumped into his assigned receiver, dropped into the end zone, caught sight of the ball and hit it with a volleyball-like spike.
Consequently, the sum at the denominator of (37) converges to K L μ k, with μ k being the mean of the random variable defined as the η-th power of the ratio between the distance of a user randomly located in the network from his assigned receiver, and the distance of the same user from receiver a k.
Second, all of the nodes in the n th hop transmit data to their own assigned receivers using the same power P n.
The horizontal holes in Figure 3(a), with the exception of the central one, are assigned for receiver nodes.
Timeslots are assigned to receivers instead of senders and potential senders for the same receiver contend for medium at the beginning of each timeslot.
Less weight is assigned to receivers closest to the transmitter and more weight to those farthest, when compared to the linear RWL method.
The relative span exponentially weighted localization (REWL) algorithm estimates a transmitter's coordinates as the weighted centroid of all receiver coordinates, as defined for WCL in (2), but with exponential weight assigned to each receiver according to a weighting factor.
The relative span weighted localization (RWL) algorithm estimates a transmitter's coordinates as the weighted centroid of all receiver coordinates, as defined for WCL in (2), but with a linearly increasing weight assigned to each receiver according to its presumed proximity to the transmitter.
