However, from the viewpoint of an entity approach, the value of a company's assets is attributed partly to debt and partly to equity capital.
According to his 2010 financial disclosure, all of McCaul's assets are attributed to his wife and dependent children.
The first systematic approach to the problem of asset allocation under uncertainty is attributed to Markowitz [1].
In 2010, approximately 80% of the S&P500 market value is attributed to intangible assets.
The remaining portion of "unexplained" value is attributed to the organization's intangible assets.
Ian Williams of Peel Hunt argues that recent company results haven't given much support either, saying: The outbreak of nervousness in risk assets has been attributed mainly to a combination of Fed tapering, Chinese growth concerns and emerging market currency volatility; we suspect the lukewarm corporate earnings news is as big an issue for equity investors.
The total represents less than 2percentt of the funds' total assets, and can be attributed mostly to the recent jump in the market value of those stocks.
In fact, there is good reason to think that the process still has a long way to go.* The safe asset shortage can also be attributed to the fact that many assets previously thought of as "safe" are no longer seen that way, whether they are Italian government bonds or subprime mortgage securities.
It shows, over time, how much of the combined market cap of companies on the S. & P. 500 could be attributed to intangible assets rather than tangible ones: In 1975, about twenty per cent of companies' valuations could be attributed to intangible assets, such as knowledge; by 2007, the proportions were reversed.
China's rise as a "world factory" since the late 1970s has been attributed to the strategic coupling of local assets in the coastal regions, viz.
