The phrase "assessments whose" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to assessments that belong to or are associated with a specific subject or entity.
Example: "The assessments whose results were published last week indicate a significant improvement in student performance."
Alternatives: "assessments that" or "assessments belonging to".
Instead, we must rely on intelligence assessments whose sources cannot be verified.
And these are just very, very hard debates to settle, because they depend on qualitative assessments (whose conspiracy theory is more round-the-bend and noxious? whose rhetoric tiptoes closest to demagoguery?) that are influenced, overly and covertly, by one's own ideological biases.
This paper highlights the importance of smart assessments whose format can be adapted to all modes and forms of learning & teaching, and which would discourage students from indulging in plagiarism.
Due to the unique cultural and language context of the study population, specific clinical assessments whose interpretation is less biased by culture and language were chosen.
Standardised and locally developed clinical assessments whose interpretation is less biased by culture and language have been chosen carefully with cross-cultural considerations in mind and are considered valid for the purpose of the study.
Assessments whose purpose was limited to the collection of basic identification information that did not contribute to the monitoring of the coverage of health services, such as lists of only phone numbers, location data, or contact information, were excluded from the analysis.
The other is the objective assessment, whose goal is to design algorithms to mimic the subjective judgment accurately and automatically.
Darwall (1977) distinguishes appraisal respect, which is based on assessment of character traits, from esteem, another attitude of positive assessment whose wider basis include any features in virtue of which one can think well of someone.
For a PPP that could already be authorised, all justifiable options for the management of the environmental risks should first be exploited before the authorities approve and accept highly complex refinements of the risk assessment whose only aim is to create more favourable conditions for application of the PPP (e.g., narrower margins to adjacent surface waters).
Within this project, a fully probabilistic approach was considered for the analyses of earthquakes, landslides, and volcanic eruptions, in order to be employed later in a fully probabilistic risk assessment, whose outputs would be useful to the development and planning of activities related to territorial ordering, land-use planning, and emergency response.
This technical assessment, whose provisions were snuck into the 2008 Naval Vessel Transfer Act, sponsored by Rep.
