Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(32)
Scores from all three assessments were compared to assess the relationship between each assessment.
Observers' assessments were compared with histologic examinations of tooth sections.
In addition, CT-based tumour size assessments were compared with pathology.
These assessments were compared to similar on-the-ground assessments made during the preceding year.
Firstly, the 33 outcomes' baseline assessments were compared via paired t test (since Kolmogorov Smirnov testing confirmed normality) for any group baseline difference.
On the whole population proportions of patients classified as "over-paralyzed," "well-paralyzed," or "under-paralyzed" differed significantly when results for clinical assessments were compared with results obtained with facial and ulnar TOF measurements (Fig. 2).
Similar(28)
Scores from these assessments are compared to Healthy Fitness Zone® standards to determine students' overall physical fitness.
The outcomes of these assessments are compared to the outcomes that were obtained during admission.
Furthermore, the distribution of the IPAQ categories at the three assessments was compared with a Friedman's ANOVA.
The agreement between both appraisers' (AH and SJ) assessments was compared on 20% of the samples using Cohen's Kappa coefficient.
Moreover, when physician and patient assessments are compared, physicians underestimate patients HR-QOL symptoms (Wilson et al, 2000; Sonn et al, 2009).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com