The phrase "assessments of violent" is not correct as it is incomplete and lacks a noun to follow "violent." It could be used in a context where you are discussing evaluations related to violent behavior or incidents, but it needs to be completed for clarity.
Example: "The assessments of violent behavior in the study revealed significant trends."
Alternatives: "evaluations of violent actions" or "analyses of violent incidents."
His pen turned out to have been prolific, including brutally frank assessments of the violent uprisings in Syria in the 1980s and Algeria in the 1990s, and a host of training manuals.
The predictive validity of the assessments for violent behavior in the next 3 months was studied.
In a sample of 201 outpatient forensic psychiatric clients, feasibility of client risk assessment, concordance with clinician assessment, and predictive validity of both assessments for violent or criminal behaviour were studied.
The current study aims to investigate the feasibility of administering our new 'Client Self-Appraisal based on START' instrument, the concordance between client and clinician risk assessments, and the predictive validity of both assessments for incidents of violent or criminal behaviour.
There are a large number of structured instruments that assist in the assessment of antisocial, violent and sexual risk, and their use appears to be increasing in mental health and criminal justice settings.
The report, "Law Enforcement Assessment of the Violent Extremism Threat," was based on survey research by Charles Kurzman, professor of sociology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and David Schanzer, director of TCTHS and associate professor of the practice at Duke University's Sanford School of Public Policy.
The predictive validity of client and case manager risk assessment for incidents of violent or criminal behaviour in the next six months was studied by logistic regression analysis and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) statistic of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis [ 24].
The amendment would require Defense Secretary Jim Mattis to "conduct two concurrent strategic assessments of the use of violent or unorthodox Islamic religious doctrine to support extremist or terrorist messaging and justification".
While there is now little doubt that structured risk assessment instruments outperform clinical judgment for the prediction of violent behavior and poor outcome for predominately male samples [ 6, 11], there is relatively little data on female forensic or correctional samples.
Review of the types of adverse health outcomes experienced by the victims of workplace violence and the assessments of severity assigned to violent incidents suggests that, compared with health care settings in the community, correctional settings are fairly safe places in which to practice.
