Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "assessment would reduce" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the potential impact of an assessment on a particular outcome or situation.
Example: "The study concluded that the assessment would reduce the number of errors in the final report."
Alternatives: "evaluation would decrease" or "review would lessen".
Exact(1)
Contrasting views were that assessment would reduce interest and constitute yet another 'hoop' through which students needed 'to jump'.
Similar(59)
According to the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, sequestration would reduce Pentagon spending to 2007 levels, a year in which the U.S. was fighting two wars and defense contractors received more than $333 billion in taxpayer money.
Russell Hobby, general secretary of the NAHT, said teacher assessment for writing would "reduce drilling and give both parents and secondary schools a far more accurate picture of pupils' achievement".
The majority of survey respondents indicated they considered that a multifactorial intervention would be effective in reducing falls for men or women of their own age (strongly agree 18.6%, agree 62.5%), and that if they were to undertake a multifactorial falls assessment intervention, it would reduce their risk of falling (strongly agree 13.5%, agree 44.5%).
A value-of-information approach was recommended to prioritize future research based on what would have the greatest impact on benefit assessment outputs and what would reduce uncertainties most effectively.
He said it was up to individual patients to decide whether they wanted to take statins, based on their risk assessment, but Nice's strategy would "reduce the burden on the health service".
"We would reduce our assessment of event risk if the government changed its framework for managing government debt to lessen or eliminate that uncertainty," Moody's analyst Steven Hess wrote in the report.
A 'pre-assessment' which includes the community would reduce the reliance of the IRB on making a judgment based on the written scientific proposal alone.
The use of a single gynaecologist in this trial would reduce this interdoctor assessment variation.
The $3,000-per-employee assessment would be reduced, on a sliding scale, for businesses that have 25 employees or fewer and pay workers less than about $27,000 a year.
More careful clinical assessment before deciding on follow-up blood culture would reduce costs and inconvenience to patients.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com