The phrase "assessment with a higher" is not complete and lacks context, making it difficult to determine its correctness in written English.
It could be used in contexts discussing evaluations or measurements that are elevated in some way, but it needs additional information to clarify its meaning.
Example: "The assessment with a higher level of difficulty challenged the students significantly."
Alternatives: "evaluation with a greater" or "review with an increased".
Telepsychiatric assessment is a dependable method of assessment with a high degree of accuracy and substantial overall intermethod agreement when compared with standard face to face interview for new routine outpatient psychiatric referrals.
An assessment with a high frequency of LOE responses could potentially be improved by providing background information, so all students designing an experiment start with the same contextual knowledge.
To date, the diagnosis of a hypomobile or hypermobile first ray has mostly been performed by clinical assessment with a high degree of variance [ 5, 20] or by static measurement methods at a limited dorsiflexion force of 55 N [ 9, 10, 12].
Other studies proved feasibility of self-assessment with a high sensitivity pregnancy test at 30 days after abortion or a semi-quantitative pregnancy test post abortion, both combined with a telephone follow-up [ 25, 26, 29].
On the other hand, a fall risk assessment tool with a high specificity but too low sensitivity will result in many older people who actually are at high fall risk being classified as having a low risk of falls (false negative) and then miss the chance to undertake an in-depth examination56.
However, a fall risk assessment tool with a high sensitivity but too low specificity will result in many older people who are not at risk of falls being classified as having a high risk of falls (false positive) and are then subject to further investigation.
When transmission of a novel influenza virus is identified, early epidemiologic measures provide a broad initial assessment, albeit with a high level of uncertainty, and were categorized by using a broad dichotomous scale.
A shorter time between first and second assessment was associated with a higher response, possibly because participants in centers with short follow-up duration still felt more involved in the study.
The proposed standard should be a systematic assessment approach starting with a high-level risk assessment, followed by experimental evaluation, and, finally, identification of PARs for CMAs, as outlined below.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; scored 0-30, with a higher score indicating better performance) was used to evaluate global cognition and, the subset of items measuring delayed recall of the five words (scored 0-5) was used to evaluate memory.
