A risk assessment was previously conducted which focused on the nitrification processes in US POTWs.
The goodness of the frequency assessment was previously validated for Heines Kolben and Hybrid 46 [ 62].
The potential role of texture analysis in liver fibrosis assessment was previously explored in retrospective studies using qualitative [ 26] and quantitative [ 26, 28– 30] texture analysis.
The initial screening survey and diagnostic assessments were previously reported in detail [ 15].
A process for evaluating analogs for use in SAR (Structure Activity Relationship) assessments was previously published (Wu et al. 2010).
Although it is unclear whether these self-assessment questions were previously validated, this is another example of the utility of subjective measurements and remote monitoring to establish whether a patient is at risk for relapse.
Subject selection, cognitive assessment, neuropathological assessment, and stratification were previously described [46].
The criteria used for assessment were as previously reported, where: 0 (negative, 25%); 1+ (weak, 25 50%); 2+ (moderate, 50 70%); 3+ (strong, 75%) of the tumor cells stained.
Detailed protocols for cardiovascular assessment have been previously described: (1) arterial stiffness assessed by ba-PWV (VP-2000 system; Colin Corp., San Antonio, TX, U.S.A).
