The phrase "assessment went further" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the extent or depth of an evaluation or analysis that has progressed beyond initial findings or expectations.
Example: "The assessment went further than we anticipated, revealing several underlying issues that needed to be addressed."
Alternatives: "assessment extended beyond" or "assessment progressed further".
Dr. Stansbury's assessment went further and claimed that it would take 10 times longer to shut down a pipeline than the company's estimate, and provided worst-case scenarios, including one where 120,000 barrels could spill into the Missouri River, and 180,000 could spill in the Nebraska Sandhills, seeping into the Ogallala Aquifer, one of the largest groundwater sources in the world.
A subsequent government regulatory impact assessment went further, and stated that 'even moderate under-nutrition can have lasting effects and compromise cognitive development and school performance' (Department for Education and Skills 2006).
The built-in compliance framework also ensures adherence to the highest standards in data privacy protection and risk assessment, going further than the current standard required by many international legal requirements and privacy impact assessments.
David Lacey wrote in The Guardian of 12 August 1989: "The FA Charity Shield is now more of a pre-season finale than a pipe opener for the main event," and Stuart Jones of The Times went further in his assessment of its decline: Liverpool striker Ian Rush, who in the previous season sustained a knee injury and was treated for shingles and hepatitis, said before the match: "I'm in great shape.
The new AAP policy moves beyond its neutral policy in 1999 and it accords with another evidence-based policy assessment in Australia in 2012 that went further by calculating the risk-benefit (100 1 in favour) and finding that over their lifetime up to half of uncircumcised males were at risk of a medical condition caused by the foreskin [ 6].
According to the report, first published by the Washington Post and the New York Times, the privacy board found that the mass phone data collection was at best marginally useful for US counter-terrorism, a finding that went further than similar assessments by a federal judge and Obama's own surveillance advisory board.
Another, Louise Mensch, went further.
