The phrase "assessment targeting" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to education, evaluation, or performance measurement, where specific assessments are aimed at particular goals or objectives.
Example: "The new curriculum focuses on assessment targeting to ensure that students meet the required learning outcomes."
Alternatives: "evaluation focus" or "assessment focus".
The Cornell Soil Health Program has developed cost-effective methods for soil health assessment, targeting important soil processes such as aeration, drainage, root growth, disease pressure, nutrient release, etc. Specific management recommendations are also suggested to address soil health constraints.
Overall, the literature reviewed reveals that online tests should be fit for purpose, assess appropriate learning outcomes and be used in conjunction with other forms of formative and summative assessment targeting different types of outcomes if they are to effectively lead to student learning (Brady, 2005; Smith, 2007; Yonker, 2011).
The United Kingdom withdrew this policy in 2004 based on the results of a large national trial, which showed that different forms of multidimensional assessment, targeting either the general population of older persons or frail older persons, offered almost no differences in patient outcomes [ 35].
If the company I work for fails to meet its assessment targets it can get fined by the DWP.
A screening assessment targeted at the neurobehavioral domains known to be impacted by cancer treatments may be more feasible.
This assessment targeted the first cohort (2006 2009) that was unique in many ways.
The study compared two different types of multidimensional assessment (targeted versus universal) and two different management models (primary care team versus multidisciplinary geriatric evaluation team).
The neuropsychological assessment targeted executive functioning, memory, and psychomotor speed and was administered at baseline and 3 and 6 months follow-up.
Image evaluation was performed by K. M. and M. P. and included overall response assessment, target lesion response, nontarget lesion response, and new lesions as required by mRECIST criteria [ 18].
The ClASS framework, finalized in 2010, comprises five components: participatory approaches; expert-led review; modules for fiscal, administrative, and clinical assessment; targeted technical assistance; and guidance for implementing the ClASS framework (15).
The aggregate exposure assessment targeted at chemicals with short biologic half-lives, such as CPF, is prone to significant spatial and temporal variations that would result in inaccurate outcome measurements.
