The phrase "assessment should focus" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the main objectives or areas of emphasis in an assessment process.
Example: "In order to improve student learning outcomes, assessment should focus on critical thinking skills and problem-solving abilities."
Alternatives: "evaluation should concentrate" or "assessment ought to emphasize".
The effectiveness assessment should focus on the synchronic points, instead of the linear line.
During long-term treatment, this assessment should focus on a broad range of outcomes, each of which should be documented in the medical record.
Because we believe cancer is a family disease with ramifications far beyond the patient, we propose that needs assessment should focus on both patients and family caregivers.
To counter these validity threats, it has been proposed that assessment should focus on the process rather than the subjectively coloured content of reflection.
Future development of SFDI for surgical-margin assessment should focus on enhancing tumor-specific scattering contrast, improving methods for spectral image co-registration with pathology, and automating image processing for near-real-time diagnostic feedback at the time of surgery.
To counter these validity threats, we suggest that assessment should focus on generic process skills rather than the subjective content of reflection and where possible to consider objective information about the triggering situation to verify described reflections.
Future assessments should focus on understanding problems at a particular site by identifying cause effect mechanisms.
Findings support a view that clinical pain assessments should focus on PTSD rather than make broad inquiries into past history of childhood abuse or neglect.
For optimal consequences, pre-implementation assessments should focus on the effects on risks to local staff members, the influence on local political relations, and the long-term relations to beneficiaries.
Future assessments should focus on identifying and documenting capacities for IHR 2005 compliance in at least a sample of jurisdictions at the local or county level.
Initial assessments should focus on identifying vulnerable facilities and populations; anticipate needs; and investigate the average disruption time in order to prepare for the next event (13).
