The phrase "assessment only at" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to specify that an assessment will take place exclusively at a certain location or time.
Example: "The assessment only at the main campus will determine your eligibility for the program."
Alternatives: "evaluation solely at" or "test exclusively at".
Still in its infancy, such an integration has been limited to: 1) risk assessment only at national and provincial scales, where intra-urban human movements are neglected, and 2) using irregularly logged cellphone data that miss numerous user movements.
However, using an older population and having dietary assessment only at the baseline, rather than a follow-up report, has considerable limitations.
In this study we assess the safety of abandoning the next day post-operative review in preference for assessment only at 2 hours post-surgery for both phacoemulsification and extracapsular surgery with heavier molecular weight OVD.
Interrater reliability of the severity assessment tool (assessed only at the primary site) was substantial (κ = 0.68).
In chemotherapy patients QOL assessments only at the day of CT administration underestimate the true symptom burden.
Six patients participated in assessments only at admission but not at discharge; three patients did not participate for organizational reasons (e.g., the patients decided to be discharged without prior notice), two patients were discharged against medical advice, and one patient refused to participate in the discharge assessment.
CACE model estimates at 3, 6 and 12 months with compliance re-defined as attendance at the individual assessment only, attendance at the individual assessment and one or more group therapy sessions and two or more group therapy sessions.
Estimates from CACE analyses redefining compliance as attendance at the individual assessment only, attendance at the individual assessment and one or more group therapy sessions and two or more group therapy sessions are reported in Table 5.
At assessment, only around one third of all participants were free of general psychopathology (as defined by not meeting clinically significant scores in self-assessment tools) and did not meet current axis 1 diagnoses in a clinical structured interview.
Of the female patients diagnosed with either AN or low-weight EDNOS at assessment, only 26 patients had secondary amenorrhea, were not taking any form of contraceptive throughout the treatment course, and had available weight data at the time ROM occurred.
In our overall risk assessment only four studies were at high risk of bias: Omer 2008 (data not reported according to randomisation, unclear denominators); Walker 2013 (all data based on provider recall); Wu 2011 (unclear denominators, other interventions in trial area and poor implementation) and Wahlstrom 2011 (unpublished data, unclear analyses).
