The phrase "assessment more precise" is not correct as it lacks a determiner or context to clarify its meaning.
You can use it in a context where you are comparing the precision of different assessments, but it needs to be rephrased for clarity.
Example: "The new evaluation method makes the assessment more precise than before."
Alternatives: "more accurate assessment" or "assessment with greater precision".
However, this also meant that risk assessment was more precise.
We modified this assessment for more precise, numeric quantification of altered proprioception and have previously demonstrated its sensitivity [ 14].
Better exposure assessment and more precise phenotype ascertainment are the most efficient ways to increase the power in such studies.
DNA sequencing in patients whose clinical presentation suggested a genetic syndrome or auditory neuropathy provided opportunities for aetiological assessment and more precise genetic counselling of patients and families.
Although the basic procedure appears unchanged, probabilistic assessment requires more precise definitions of each step and thus also promotes greater transparency as to the biological and quantitative assumptions underlying the dose response assessment.
Ideally, every large clinical trial assessing efficacy and safety of new oncological treatments should include a questionnaire-based QoL assessment, enabling more precise estimation of the associated adverse events.
The major advantage of this assessment is that it allows more precise assessment of the metabolic effects of ingredients.
In this paper new assessment method for more precise determining of cooling loads and seasonal cooling demands of residential buildings are developed, which are necessary for right solutions of cooling efficiency problems.
The quantitative software-based assessment provides a more precise measure of JSW in millimetres and permits the assessor to document appreciable change in JSW in the tibiofemoral compartment 18 19 In contrast, the semiquantitative approach, for example, the KL grading or the OARSI score, has limitations that lead to insensitivity to changes in status.
We chose three month intervals between assessments to enable more precise examination of the rate and direction of change than is available in many longitudinal studies with assessment intervals of a year or more [ 22, 23].
